13-03-2012, 04:56 PM
The elephant in the room with Thornley is whether "Brother In Law" was E Howard Hunt? This seems to be traceable since brother in law was the alleged relative of Slim Brooks who was a member of Banister's Anti-Communist League. This seems like simple research work to trace whether brother in law actually was Hunt. Just from what he says it looks like brother in law was too close to New Orleans and nearby, according to Thornley's recounting, to actually be Hunt since Hunt was located in Washington. In a way it doesn't matter if brother in law was Hunt or not since Thornley had close interface with the Garrison New Orleans cabal.
Thornley is another Oswald-type who flips from Ayn Rand capitalist "objectivist" to being on Castro's side if Nixon killed JFK. Maybe the fact Thornley wasn't killed indicates his proximity to the cabal.
Thornley is another Oswald-type who flips from Ayn Rand capitalist "objectivist" to being on Castro's side if Nixon killed JFK. Maybe the fact Thornley wasn't killed indicates his proximity to the cabal.