William Pawley, the Kennedy Assassination, and.......... by Peter Dale Scott

[Scott Kaiser]

Now, if you don't mind, I'd like to re-ask the question before I was so rudely interrupted, do you think that criminals ever return to the scene of the crime? And, if so, do you suppose those who were responsible for Dallas went to Washington DC as a celebration of success?

Scott, are you referring to the on-the-ground mechanics/shooters etc who carried it out, or the various planners a step or two higher up? It is a fair question. The former group, I couldn't say. The latter group probably had elements within Washington (Pentagon/CIA/Army intelligence/FBI/ take your pick) who worked there, so they would indeed be returning to Washington to celebrate. I'm no expect so I'll defer to others, including yourself, if there is evidence or anecdotes that you feel is worthy of commentary.

Totally off the topic, but on the topic of 'celebrating' various deep events, a Mark Crispin Miller book I have on the shelf notes how the Bush administration hosted a celebration for the Mexican ambassador one evening, holding a lavish ball with numerous Bush admin attendees. The event made the local press as the ball was capped with an unusually large and lavish fireworks display that went on for an extra-long amount of time and which woke up residents all over the city. Newspapers criticised the administration for the event and asked why such a large fireworks display was required, this is the loudest display we can remember seeing etc etc, what were you thinking? The ball took place in 2001, about a week before 9/11.

I once said, I will always answer a question. Before I answer your question, can you answer me this? Why is it that folks including researchers, even those who are highly respected by everyone, feel the need to make Jack's assassination anymore complicated, or more difficult then it already is. I mean, why does there have to be someone from the (Pentagon/CIA/Army intelligence/FBI/) (why would I need to take my pick?)

How many understand that there was as many rouge agents who worked for the CIA, but quit the CIA and continued their infiltration's into Cuba. How many even know that when Nixon shut it all down there were only (30) remaining frogmen still infiltrating Moa Bay?

Anthony, if you really want the truth from me, then please let me start by saying, killing Kennedy does not need to be as complicated as you think with all the higher-ups having to be involved. These stories have been going on for decades. They, the higher-ups were there to prevent a world war that everyone else was hoping would break out.

That's why there was the WC. To prevent war, that's why Congress couldn't trump the WCR. Ever hear of Congress running out of money? I have a lot to say, and it's because of my unorthodox information regarding our history events that many folks can not and will not accept, and that's due to what is contrary to what these people believe in, truthfully, I don't care what people believe, it's what I can prove. This is the just of the assassination, as Watergate, people will always believe what they want, and no one can change that.

[Anthony Thorne]

Scott, I was responding to your original question, which I quoted above, and not to anything else you've written here. Thanks anyway.