Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I do not pray.
#1
I am an agnostic.

I hope that doesn't offend anyone, but it is what it is.

However, if YOU believe in prayer, then, on the off chance that it works, PRAY for Jim Fetzer. His claims are becoming even more bizarre than before and he is mixing real dangers with those he has contrived.

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4564
GO_SECURE

monk


"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."

James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
Reply
#2
I pray.

Not within the destructive confines of any organized religion.

I pray.

Not to a fictional deity. Not to Darwin. Not to a universe that can be quantified.

I pray.

Not to an accidental cosmos.

I pray.

Today I prayed within a Catholic church. Not because prayers offered away from sacred ground are not heard. I am not a Catholic, nor do I practice any religion.

I prayed in the presence of the holy woman who is Thomas Merton's patron saint. We acknowledged each other.

And yes, prayer is, for me, a form of communication. And not just with myself.

I remember Jim Fetzer in my prayers.

And within the same prayer I ask for love and mercy for John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his killers.

Until the life of the assassin is held to be as sacred as the life of the assassinated, the assassinations will continue.

It's complicated. And it's simple.

I pray.

And I am answered. Prayed for.

God bless and love and make well Jim Fetzer.
Reply
#3
Amen.
GO_SECURE

monk


"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."

James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
Reply
#4
Ed Sherry emailed this to me today.

After I read it I really didn't know what to think.

Especially coming on the heels of the Alex Jones fiasco on CNN.

With Jones I was angry with the guy.

With Fetzer, it was, to quote the Bard, more in sorrow than in anger. Whatever you thought of the guy, there were some interesting contributions in his anthologies.

But now, this?
Reply
#5
I saw that too. The man either has no shame or no clue. Just so sad....
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#6
Charles Drago Wrote:I pray.

Not within the destructive confines of any organized religion.

I pray.

Not to a fictional deity. Not to Darwin. Not to a universe that can be quantified.

I pray.

Not to an accidental cosmos.

I pray.

Today I prayed within a Catholic church. Not because prayers offered away from sacred ground are not heard. I am not a Catholic, nor do I practice any religion.

I prayed in the presence of the holy woman who is Thomas Merton's patron saint. We acknowledged each other.

And yes, prayer is, for me, a form of communication. And not just with myself.

I remember Jim Fetzer in my prayers.

And within the same prayer I ask for love and mercy for John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his killers.

Until the life of the assassin is held to be as sacred as the life of the assassinated, the assassinations will continue.

It's complicated. And it's simple.

I pray.

And I am answered. Prayed for.

God bless and love and make well Jim Fetzer.

Amen
Jim
Reply
#7
Going back

to Assassination Science 1998

to Murder in Dealey Plaza 2000

and a video of John Costella in so many parts

part of a 2003 seminar on the Great Zapruder Hoax

there is none of this Mossad business.



I do not pray per se

but between the stained glass garden meditation

and the hatbox constellation symphony

I am certain karma will iron out the wrinkles

Dr., all thy sins remembered



Greg showed us the Press TV article

and I linked the Fetzer blog wherein he says

he'd've used the subjunctive rather than their declarative headline

No matter: Jews did it


He is mad with a method: Surely the anti-Israel flavor is in keeping with

the New War Drum Beat:


Fetzer is a frequent contributor to the state-owned Iranian news network.

Early last year he wrote a story in which he called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the "Chicken Little of the Middle East." In [B][B]an extensive interview[/B] with the network he skewered U.S. foreign policy towards the Islamic Republic.[/B]


Brzezinski and Gates' 2004 CFR paper Iran: Time for a New Approach and the CIA/NATO Arab Spring is the realization of the second phase of the post-911 business model:

Hagel and Brennan present as its executors under the larger auspice.

Fetzer plays a dual game: he muddies the water on the occasion of the 50[SUP]th[/SUP] anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy and the 100[SUP]th[/SUP] anniversary of the Federal Reserve:

He creates a Sandy Hook scenario which is a patchwork quilt of speculative anti-Semitism and paranoic hallucination:

Consider:

Lenin and Trotsky were terrorists. Lenin was an outspoken proponent of terrorism. The founder of the Lukid [sic] Party and sixth Prime Minister of Israel was an Irgun terrorist. Study its history. No nation in the world cares more about its own interests and less about those of the United State than Israel.

The bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on 22 July 1946, was a stunning example. The attack on the USS Liberty and Israel's bombing of its own Embassy and Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994 are other illustration.

Those who study 9/11 are all too aware of the role of the Neo-Cons and the Mossad. But the American press covers it up-and Congress is controlled by AIPAC. As Bill Casey, former CIA Director, observed, "Our disinformation program will be complete when everything the American public believes is false." Sandy Hook is the latest example.


The current link is to CampusReform.org: http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4564

which references the original Press TV article:

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/12/20/...-children/

Fetzer is running across hot coals:

Vis-à-vis JFK, he insists upon the most outré interpretation of Altgens 6 as the prime issue in the case;

in re 911 he hews to space beams and a Judy Woods breathlessness;

as to the Sandy Hook shooting, it's Mossad ex machina, based on nothing but cotton candy, salt water taffy, the sawdust and the carny barkers of the midway.

In the fevered brow
of the professor brews
a stew of jews:


"This is exactly what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions against Israel was retaliated against by a lone gunman' who killed 77 children. This is what Israel always does, they go after the children.

"It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It is what happened at Sandy Hook.


I have every reason to believe
the universe loves all her beings
and will balance them
despite themselves

Some call it Grace, others Tao,
Karma, Yin/Yang
And she does this
Though we like Leonard Cohen warned
May "forget to pray for the angels"

Fetzer takes his place on the Great Mandala


poof
Reply
#8
Obviously when I took a break from the internet something happened to Fetz.
Pre-2003 I suppose to be true approximation of the um, change.

So damn odd.
I have a video Dr. Fetzer made, it is quite old but I don't know the date, except that it was in the time the Professor still taught at Duluth. It is quite good and takes a long view of the Nov. Coup much more like Fletcher Prouty than Jerk fascist Piper.

I am glad I got that tape transferred to DvD before the tape degraded to death. It did die eventually when being rewound. It is great for Intro stuff for newly interested folks.

Reminds me of the Gary Mack I became aware of on TMWKK contrasted with the one we all know of now.

I am quite disappointed. I like the early work Fetzer did.
I do not understand what happened.
I wish the best for the man.
I'll keep the books and such and hope for healing to a spirit that once taught me much.
Jim
Reply
#9
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Ed Sherry emailed this to me today.

After I read it I really didn't know what to think.

Especially coming on the heels of the Alex Jones fiasco on CNN.

With Jones I was angry with the guy.

With Fetzer, it was, to quote the Bard, more in sorrow than in anger. Whatever you thought of the guy, there were some interesting contributions in his anthologies.

But now, this?

Beyond sick. I now consider them both disinfo agents. I had never seen Alex in a debate forum before. I had not watched him on tv in many years as I cannot stand his bombastic style. He was unhinged on CNN. An embarrassment to 9-11 truthers. As is Fetzer. Is it "crazy" or something more? I vote number two, but that is just me. I have no prior history with Fetzer.

Dawn
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)