The Truth and Amnesty Commission for JFK -- A Cautionary Tale

[Charles Drago]

[Phil Dragoo]

Jeffrey and Albert to the contrary notwithstanding, Charles' thesis has a historic basis, and exists in a 4300-word treatise with an original and revised version, reflecting our mortal reformation unto death.

He posits amnesty for those covered persons predicated on their supply of truthful answers.

Much of the ARRB sessions with the three stooges of Bethesda begged for some door to open and a team of humorless men to hustle the particular lying clown to a sub-basement for a seminar on pain and the promise of pain.

Vince Salandria had more mercy for Arlen Specter than Emperor Palpatine might:

http://politicalassassinations.com/2012/11/1560/

Charles defines the position of the majority who know a criminal conspiracy murdered the inconvenient president in a historical continuum involving a different kind of destiny from that described in Jim DiEugenio's revisit of Jim Garrison's case against CIA asset Clay Shaw, to wit Manifest Destiny.

That's a look back which must be undertaken--with a populace purposely cauterized from thought.

Charles once wrote of the need to be as concerned with the souls of the conspirators as the victims.

Salandria takes a merciful approach, analyzes Specters actions, but, fatally, does not coax a thing from the key man in the con job.

The so-transparent "post-partisan Obama" won't summon the Joannides files to be displayed in the Blue Room.

Dallas is still run by a council of Daddy Warbucks & His Barrel of Crackers.

While the enormous preponderance of conscious humans knows--not theorizes--of the precise nature of the plot.

It sent armies out a decade ago and is preparing more at this moment, awaiting only the perfect pretext, the next Tonka Toy Resolution.

Would petitions move those who partition the Plaza for the running of their bull

Would the veiled sister (pain) pray for the witnesses slain