U.S. Postal Money Orders... circa 1950 to 1963

[Jim Hargrove]

This is background information for an upcoming new writeup by John Armstrong on the rifle that allegedly killed JFK, which should be completed and online in a few weeks.

CLICK HERE

[Tom Scully]

Mr. Hargrove,

You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts
almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately
associated it with John Armstrong.

Please take down your link to your web page displaying my unattributed original research details here and on the Education Forum, and remove every detail of my original research, and images I am the original presenter of, from your web pages.

For comparison:

http://jfk.education/node/11 and http://jfk.education/node/13
Late 1950's - early 1960's automated check processing innovation.:
http://jfk.education/node/12

Throughout this process, from about November 1, 2015, this research has been collaborative, co-operative, and presented in a team like spirit, your new presentation being a disturbing exception.....

http://jfk.education/node/11Sorry Brian, Jean, and DVP, Banks Did Not Key-Punch 1963 P.O. Money Orders


Submitted by Admin on Tue, 11/10/2015 - 06:47
Updated November 19, 2015:
https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceeding...680479.pdf
(Lance Payette brought this to my attention, today. "File Locator Numbers - See Explanation, below
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1...4873&hl=en

...........

Shortly after my November 10, initial presentation of my original research, google.com news archive dropped access to Palm Beach Post articles, of which the one I presented an image of, was one.:
https://sites.google.com/site/palmbeachc...newspapers vs.
https://news.google.com/newspapers#P

It seems this change by google.com left you no alternative than to include the article image file from my presentation (just one small example) , cropped by you, but with my unique red highlighting visible.:


When I originally presented this research on this forum, David Joseph reacted by launching a competing thread, directed at David Von Pein
who merely recounted, with attribution, the original research of Lance
Payette and myself.
presenting obsolete information which you enthusiastically posted in.:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...o3_loShe78

I do not see how your efforts conform to presentation of the most accurate information as soon as possible because I understand no higher priority than promptly attempting to present the most accurate and A.S.A.P. components, and always in good faith, giving credit where credit is due.

[Jim Hargrove]

Tom,

At your request, I have hidden the directory containing John's new write-up on the Harvey and Lee website until he has a chance to respond to your accusations. (It may take several weeks for him to get to this.)

I seriously doubt there is a real copyright issue here, however. Are you claiming ownership of the Palm Beach Post?

[Drew Phipps]

Without weighing in on any legal merits of anybody's position (not that I'm qualified to do so anyhow), it seems to me that it would be polite to properly attribute materials from other researchers.

[Jim DiEugenio]

That's a good point.

So just tell John to properly attribute it.

[Albert Doyle]

This latest overview raises interesting questions about what rifle they intended to set Oswald up with for the Walker shooting?

[Jim Hargrove]

Mr. Hargrove,

You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts
almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately
associated it with John Armstrong.

To Tom Scully,

I've checked your links and haven't found "almost word for word" copies of your research in John Armstrong's "Postal Money Orders" article that I hid for a week at your request.

Please copy and post in this thread Mr. Armstrong's words that you found so offensive. I plan to unhide Mr. Armstrong's article eventually if you don't respond ....

Jim

[Jim Hargrove]

Second Request To Tom Scully....

I've checked your links and haven't found "almost word for word" copies of your research in John Armstrong's "Postal Money Orders" article that I hid for a week at your request.

Please copy and post in this thread Mr. Armstrong's words that you found so offensive. I plan to unhide Mr. Armstrong's article eventually if you don't respond ....

Jim

[Jim Hargrove]

Mr. Hargrove,

You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts
almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately
associated it with John Armstrong.

For the third time....

To Tom Scully,

I've checked your links and haven't found "almost word for word" copies of your research in John Armstrong's "Postal Money Orders" article that I hid for more than a week at your request.

Please copy and post in this thread Mr. Armstrong's words that you found so offensive. I plan to unhide Mr. Armstrong's article eventually if you don't respond ....

Do you need me to unhide the web page now so you can quote the words that offended you so terribly?

Jim

[Jim Hargrove]

For the Fourth Time, Tom Scully,


I've checked your links and haven't found "almost word for word" copies of your research in John Armstrong's "Postal Money Orders" article that I hid for more than two weeks at your request. I have found all sorts of copies of Mr. Armstrong's words at your links that I know you don't have permission to re-post.

Please copy and post in this thread Mr. Armstrong's words that you found so offensive. I plan to unhide Mr. Armstrong's article within days if you don't respond ....


Do you need me to unhide the web page now so you can quote the words that offended you so terribly?

It's time to respond, Mr. Scully....


Jim