Alex Jones

[Peter Lemkin]

I am NO fan of Jones...not all all.
My first and lasting impression of him is as a self-promoting, egoistic blowhard...what ever his agenda is.
He has always had what I consider to be a strange mix of real expose on conspiracy facts [or probable conspiracies/false-flags] mixed in with what I'd consider demonstrably false/faux ones and some strange religious and rightwing issues mix.

Stratfor is a privatized intelligence agency, largely made up of 'former' intelligence types.
Stratfor has a bias toward Israel policies and US policies toward Israel...they also have many other biases toward other pro-war, neo-fascist, militaristic, oligarchic, status quo, secret government, corporate, military-industrial-intelligence-complex oriented things, agencies, people and nations. That said, I think it a slight stretch to call them 'Zionist'....though pro-Zionist might fit the bill. I also see no evidence they are an Israeli intelligence entity. Pro-Israeli intelligence, yes; also pro US and UK intelligence and electronic spying. They are simply pro espionage and pro covert operation to support a neocon or neo-fascist agenda.

I have read the stuff on connections between Jones and his crew and Stratfor and it may well be - but is it because he is a propaganda or 'dangle' mouthpiece for them, or they have mutual overlapping interests? I don't claim to know.

I usually ignore Jones, but know he has a large following of somewhat low-brow but mostly well-meaning and concerned followers. His bizarre doings in Dallas on the 50th was really a circus and made me decide to not ever watch any of his antics again! Any 'good' guests he has can be seen elsewhere without the blowhard bombast and the advertising - or religious end-of-the-World stuff.

I know nothing about him vis-a-vis the Jesuits, but know that Jesuits come in both ultra-right and ultra-left variants....thought the former are much more prevalent.

I have NO problem with condemnations of Jones and his shows and spin offs, but caution the wording used and associations made be done with some care. Who or what he is is very likely not what it 'seems' and could well have intelligence angles or he is used by them. He would not be the first nor the last. His style is very similar to the political analyst blowhards on the ultra-right MSM shows, but he appears to be coming from a stance in opposition to much of what they stand for. I'm not convinced...but he has, at times, supported the correct thing...but that could be a trick, as mentioned, to act as the piped-piper to lead others off the cliff......into being exposed.....or in trouble/discredited in various ways. That kind of thing is as old as intelligence.

I think looking closer at Strafor rather than Jones would be more fruitful...without neglecting whatever interconnections there are. If there are, surely Stratfor is wagging Jones and not the other way around.