I couldn't resist!

[Scott Kaiser]

The devil made me do it, I tried, and tried to resist, I even prayed, Lord help me help my stupid self and not post for awhile to get away from it all, but my stupid self said post! Devil, I hate you!

Now that I've ranted a bit, stupid really is as stupid does, or in some cases says?

After coming across this thread, I'm not sure where to begin, on page one, or the last page, perhaps, everything in between? What to say? How to address it? What to think? It certainly has me confused, I wonder, is this how it really is with folks who are seeking truth? Or, an opportunity? In Miami, we call them opportunists. I must say, never have I thought this day would come when folks end their story with what they believe is their synopsis of Kennedy's assassination, and what it means to them. In a nutshell, and by no means am I using the synonym word "nutshell" loosely.

However, I think this thread should win an Oscar Award!

Where do I start?

"Coming soon!
General Walker and the Murder of President Kennedy: The Extensive New Evidence of a Radical-Right Conspiracy" My personal favorite whenever I see, This book is in the printing stages, stay tuned for further information regarding availability and pricing. That just gets me everytime!

I must admit reading a few posts from Paul Trejo gave me goosebumps, as if I were reading a horror show. Well, don't take my word for it, but Paul says, "Your silly CIA-did-it theories have failed for 50 years now." And, "James DiEugenio is getting better at wise-cracks, but Don Adams has the real facts about the JFK conspiracy."

Well, I do agree with Paul on one thing, Jim is getting better. If this is all about money, then can someone tell me why I wasn't advised? I would love to hear what Paul has to say about the assassination, but I have a feeling that I already know he believes it was Milteer and Somerset's information, with the far right leading the way, and at the forefront, while we're at it, we might as well add in the KKK.

Just what part of my silly CIA theory Paul wishes not to believe that I might present [in-full] to prove a theory? Folks can go on believing that Mr. White with the revolver in the Library, or was that Mrs. Scarlet who killed Kennedy? But, seriously, if ALL the information I've personally posted overtime has been disclosed, and, even the best researchers already knew about the information I've posted, then I have not done my job. But!

If [some] of ALL the information I've posted overtime has never been discovered until now, and the information has been corroborated by evidence, imagine what else? Paul, here's some free advise, don't put to much faith in Milteer, Somerset or Adams. It really is a smokescreen to prevent the truth from coming out, the CIA needs/needed the FBI for just that. Remember, it was the FBI who was suppose to take the lead in this case, they did, with documents that were FIRST followed up by the CIA. And, as documents were leaking in the 90's when in-fact they should have leaked during the HSCA, then, their conclusion wouldn't have been noted as a "possible conspiracy."

And what's even more frighting is that, they know it. Posted link for humor, the devil made me do it! I really need not pay my electric and internet bills, perhaps, that will help!

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....06&page=77

[Scott Kaiser]

JFK EXHIBIT F-429C: Please read the below paragraph with understanding:

"The person -would have to come (here) and if the Soviets would have granted the visa, then that would have accredited the person-like, you know, the person would have been given a transit visa because I feel that if the Soviets had granted the visa, then he would have come here. (In that era) it was not so crazy (that he tried) to come to Cuba because if he had obtained the visa from another country, it would have been for certain that our Consul would have granted him the visa to stop here. Now, can you imagine if that person had been to Cuba in October and then in November the President of the United States would have been killed? That is why it has always been something -- a very obscure thing -- something suspicious-- because I interpreted it as a deliberate attempt to link Cuba with Kennedy's death. That is one of the things that seemed to me very strange...."

You see, the CIA fu*@ed up by going to the Cuba embassy [first] requesting a Visa from the embassy, they said we have Oswald's photos and him on tape calling the embassy, then, the CIA realized they needed Oswald to go to the Russian embassy for a transit Visa. So, what did the CIA do? Make it appear as though Oswald visited the Russian embassy after visiting the Cuban embassy, Kennedy gets assassinated, Oswald is a Cuban agent, so, Oswald must be leaving for Russia after the assassination, so, lets now have a reason to declare war on Cuba.

The CIA provided this information to Fidel Castro, but Castro again was able to defy the United States again!

The CIA made too many mistakes, then, they tried to cover their tracks. This is what Watergate was about, however, Frank recruited the wrong man, had [Ed Kaiser] my father gone along with killing Nixon and on more than one trip to Washington, then Liebengood wouldn't have had the information Kaiser gave him, it is true that my father did turn on Frank, and Frank knew it, after all, he refuted my father's testimony.

When Kennedy was in office, those who were trained by the CIA fought to free Cuba from Castro, that's what Kennedy's assassination is about. When Watergate happened, it was about freeing Cuba, that's what Watergate was about, and Nixon got lucky, or, perhaps, I should say my father did, there was no pasty to blame and the five instead of the six got nabbed.

When Orlando Bosch was released from prison, Nixon was threaten he would be assassinated if he didn't release Bosch, whether or not my father would have killed him is pure speculation, but if my father backed out of killing Nixon at the VVAW, then I seriously doubt he would have killed the president of the United States, could he have said what he said to make himself appear as this big bad guy? Perhaps, but, he also turned on Frank and a lot of others as well.

The CIA did take out Kennedy, they wanted war with Cuba, they loss at the Bay of Pigs, and although Kennedy saved millions of lives along with Khrushchev by avoiding the Cuban Missile Crisis, the CIA still loss, they wanted war with Cuba, to free Cuba.

When Nixon came to power the CIA believed they'd have their man in office, they'd go back into Cuba and really do something. Nixon shut it all down, the CIA again loss to Cuba, Watergate would be away to fund another run into Cuba now that Nixon scaled back operations into Cuba, Nixon cut the CIA's funding, and reduced the CIA to nearly nothing and funds were getting harder to get now that private funding and the hope for a free Cuba was becoming weakened by the lack of groups showing any real willingness to fight Castro as Castro fought to free Cuba from Batista.

There is so much I have to say about this, that it takes over 300 pages to fully explain each episode. Just know that I'm not in this for money, recognition, fame or fortune. I'm not in this to be speaking at every major conference just to pretend I'm someone important, I'm not in this to side with one side or the other, although, some have gotten upset that I've not taken their side, that's not what this is about for me, what this is about, is retribution, punishment towards this government who cleverly gave up on JFK/RFK and MLK when they used the excuse the committee ran out of funding, yet congress will support billions of dollars to go into an Iraq war and war with ISIS that doesn't concern us nor do they have any real way of making it across to this country for war, yet, this country depends on subsidiary of the Middle East for dependency of oil.

Have a good day!

[Scott Kaiser]

For me, what this is about is telling my father's story to the best of my ability, and justice for my father's death, why should I let something go that I know the CIA killed my father, tell me, why should I let my father's death go? If one person can give me a good reason why I should let it go, I will never post about my father again.

[Scott Kaiser]

^Now's your chance Dawn.

[Scott Kaiser]

Caroline Kennedy, who I think is a wonderful person also said she has no interest in wanting to re-investigate her father's murder, that's her decision. If she had half the willingness as her brother did to look into it again, may be, just may be, there would be one last hearing, now that most of the FOIA documents have been leaked during the 90's and not back in the 70's during the investigations of the HSCA.

And, may be, just may be, if Jr. was alive, and he had half the willingness I have to want to know what happened to our father's, then you can bet Jr. would have had one last investigation, and if he were alive. I'd ask that I teamed up with him, to prove the CIA's involvement. And, you can take that to the bank!