London attack a false flag

[Hei Sing Tso]

I view that there are two possible reasons behind the London attack, the first was that US deep state has lost control on ISIS or Trump has stopped support for ISIS anymore, so that ISIS waived its promise not to attack US's most trusted ally, another possibility was a false flag operation staged by the UK deep state collaborating with the Bexit powers, strengthening the conservative party and also warning the Scottish independence.

[David Guyatt]

What evidence is there of a false flag?

[Rolf Zaeschmar]

What evidence is there of a false flag?

Lack of motive, for one. What did the attacker get from his suicide mission?

Also, early reports of another man in custody, and the texting right before the attack.

[Peter Lemkin]

What evidence is there of a false flag?

Lack of motive, for one. What did the attacker get from his suicide mission?

Also, early reports of another man in custody, and the texting right before the attack.

While we don't know his motive, one might imagine it was anger at the way the Muslim World has been treated both inside the UK and more so in majority Muslim nations under siege. [i.e., no shortage of motive]. He got: one policeman dead, another wounded; an attack on the centerpiece of UK 'structure'; many other dead and over 40 wounded. We don't yet know what he texted, but so what? It could be anything from 'here goes', to a family member, to someone with what to do to find his will or personal things. I personally didn't hear of another man in custody, although there were reports of two persons involved at the beginning. Hardly evidence of false-flag, just confusion in the early moments. I have seen and called a lot of false-flag attacks, I just don't see it yet with this one. If it turns out someone knew he was going to do this and let it happen, that would be different....or an equivalent scenario.

[Rolf Zaeschmar]

While we don't know his motive, one might imagine it was anger at the way the Muslim World has been treated both inside the UK and more so in majority Muslim nations under siege.

The problem is that terrorizing civilians always works against whatever cause you are advocating for. Stuff likes this results in more "let's go and kick their ass" -type thinking, which only helps out the warhawks and other purveyors of social chaos.

We don't yet know what he texted, but so what?

Maybe it was more like "Raymond Shaw? Raymond Prentiss Shaw?"

... there were reports of two persons involved at the beginning. Hardly evidence of false-flag, just confusion in the early moments.

Yes, reports of anything other than the lone gunman is always just confusion. Uh-huh.