Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Where the heck is Albert Doyle?
Richard Gilbride Wrote:Well. I was fooled into thinking that Doyle had his posting privileges re-instated. I do not understand why the moderators allowed Doyle's post #72 of October 3rd, yet continue to suspend him- 6 months now. I ask the moderators to please re-read, with care, post #72 (which presents a summary of Doyle's case) and present a valid reason for his continued suspension.

In this case the moderators have acted in blatant violation of Deep Politics RULES OF ENGAGEMENT #1 and #13.

#1) You will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, hateful, harassing, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, pornographic, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law.

#13) All members, including DPF moderators and founders, should receive identical treatment from the DPF moderators, and abide by the agreed rules of engagement.

They have protected the shoddy PrayerMan evidence as well as the inaccurate DiEugenio claim that Kamp's essay helps determine Oswald's whereabouts- which Doyle has correctly debunked. And for which he gets railroaded.

As far as I know he can post, subject to the posts being moderated. After several posts approved he'd get back normal non-moderated posting privileges. You and he seem to want the Forum to delete content/posts of others based on their opinion. That is not our job and don't/won't. I would suggest he post and and stop telling you he can't and you posting that untruth here. The forum has 'protected' nothing and no one, as you cite above. This is a total mis-understanding of our role and rules.

IMO, your citing of Rule 1 as meaning that the Forum through the moderators should delete material or cite for moderation or other censure anyone who may have made a written statement that we or some unknown consensus feels is false [not factual] is way way way way way off the mark. What was meant, I believe, was posting knowingly false statements [that the poster knew or felt was not as stated for the purpose of doing harm to the Forum, to other members, to the research community at large]. I know I try my best to abide by #13, but remember that that applies to ALL members. I can not speak for others.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Oswald and the mysterious Albert Schweitzer University James Lewis 9 5,517 14-03-2018, 08:23 PM
Last Post: David Josephs
  New Story about Albert Osborne John Kowalski 14 17,151 02-08-2017, 01:41 AM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  Who Was Edwin Albert Ekdahl, Stepfather of Lee Harvey Oswald? Peter Lemkin 0 3,606 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  The "Albert Doyle" Operation: Evidence and Conclusions Charles Drago 0 7,412 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  "Cinque," Fetzer, "Doyle" and the Tactics of Subversion Charles Drago 0 2,946 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  The Palamara, "Doyle," Fetzer, and Jeffries Dust-Ups: The Simple Reason Why Charles Drago 0 2,629 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Albert Rossi Reviews Destiny Betrayed 2nd Edition Jim DiEugenio 0 8,031 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Albert Rossi will be joining Jim DiEugenio 0 1,988 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)