Alex Rorke

[Scott Kaiser]

I also wanted to add that The Kenilworth hotel where Alex checked in often is only a two story hotel, that is where Newman must have gotten that information from 2-A, also, the doc says some men went to visit Alex in his room 817, but he was standing outside his "hotel" with an unidentified white male who is described much like my father. I've never told anyone this but Sherry , I told her my father introduced Alex to my mother in Conn. she remembers him. Confession time!

[Scott Kaiser]

According to Connecticut's mandatory laws, and a person's prior arrests, hell my father should have been locked up, and the key temporarily thrown away, after attacking a police officer in Norwalk in his 20's with a knife, than backs a State Trooper out a bar at gunpoint in 1960 in Alaska, then beats up a police officer in California, perhaps, Kennedy would've lived?

[Peter Lemkin]

Scott, stop your flame war with Tom or the thread will be closed and you'll be one step away from moderation. You don't have to agree with someone [speaking to both of you - and all reading], but you can not bash another member with foul language or overly angry comments and ad hom attacks. Enough! In fact, too much.

[Scott Kaiser]

Scott, stop your flame war with Tom or the thread will be closed and you'll be one step away from moderation. You don't have to agree with someone [speaking to both of you - and all reading], but you can not bash another member with foul language or overly angry comments and ad hom attacks. Enough! In fact, too much.

Now that I have taken the time to listen to you, I wonder, have you ever asked yourself why I get so upset? Certainly, some folks would say because you want to make this about you, well isn't that the furthest from the truth? My next question would be, has anyone paid attention to anything I've said, or is it because some folks are too busy finding a simple way to discredit me that they're looking for shortcuts now?

I know how to handle my cool, and it can only be under control for so long before I have to explode, what Tom is giving me are not answers to any of my questions, but rather a blow up of material he enjoy's dumping without doing any real research himself, he's saying, how could this be Scott if this and that isn't happening, my (interpretation) of Tom, not that he wants to discover the truth, but rather deter me from it, but why? Well, when you think about it, the answer is rather simple, because I, (Tom) want to discredit you, (Scott) isn't that what researchers do? So, everyone can move onto the next important subject, that is until a story is told that makes it impenetrable, no defense, no offense, just a story that cannot be disputed or discredited, isn't that how it's suppose to be? Or, do we neglect what is?