Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
CIA & Saudi Arabia Conspired to Keep 9/11 Details Secret - New Book
A "deeply compartmented plan" for something for sure. Just not for recruitment.

Quote:CIA and Saudi Arabia Conspired To Keep 9/11 Details Secret, New Book Says

By Jeff SteinOn 8/28/18 at 6:00 AM

It's easier to bury uncomfortable facts than to confront them. So this September 11, the ceremonies marking the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, D.C., will simply honor the dead. In Manhattan, tourists and mourners will gather where the World Trade Center Towers once stood, lowering their heads in memory of the 2,606 who perished there. The services won't reflect the view that the attacks might well have been prevented.
But for hundreds of families and a growing number of former FBI agents, the grief of another 9/11 ceremony will be laced with barely muted rage: There remains a conspiracy of silence among high former U.S. and Saudi officials about the attacks.
"It's horrible. We still don't know what happened," said Ali Soufan, one of the lead FBI counterterrorism agents whom the CIA kept in the dark about the movements of the future Al-Qaeda hijackers. To Soufan and many other former national security officials, the unanswered questions about the events leading up to the September 11, 2001, attacks dwarf those about the assassination of John F. Kennedy, because "9/11 changed the whole world." It not only led to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the fracturing of the Middle East and the global growth of Islamic militantism but also pushed the U.S. closer to being a virtual homeland-security police state.
"I am sad and depressed about it," said Mark Rossini, one of two FBI agents assigned to the CIA's Osama bin Laden unit, who says agency managers mysteriously blocked them from informing their headquarters about future Al-Qaeda plotters present in the United States in 2000 and again in the summer of 2001. "It is patently evident the attacks did not need to happen and there has been no justice," he said.
Recommended Slideshows
[Image: trailer-large-image_0.jpg]78
Worst Movies of All Time: These Films Got 0 Percent on Rotten Tomatoes

[Image: real-estate-what-300k-gets-you-every-state.jpg]51
Real Estate: What a $300K House Looks Like In Every State

[Image: 25-most-powerful-passports-world.jpg]59
The 25 Most Powerful Passports in the World

The authors of a new book on 9/11 hope to refocus public attention on the cover-up. Thoroughly mining the multiple official investigations into the event, John Duffy and Ray Nowosielski find huge holes and contradictions in the official story that 9/11 was merely "a failure to connect the dots."
Duffy, a left-leaning writer and environmental activist, and Nowosielski, a documentary filmmaker, have nowhere near the prominence of other journalists who have poked holes in the official story, in particular Lawrence Wright, author of The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11, the Pulitzer Prizewinning book that was turned into a gripping multi-part docudrama on Hulu earlier this year.
But Duffy and Nowosielski come to the story with a noteworthy credential: In 2009 they scored an astounding video interview with Richard Clarke, a White House counterterrorism adviser during the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. In it, Clarke raged that top CIA officials, including director George Tenet, had withheld crucial information from him about Al-Qaeda's plotting and movements, including the arrival in the U.S. of future hijackers Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi. In The Watchdogs Didn't Bark: The CIA, NSA, and the Crimes of the War on Terror, the authors assemble a compelling case of a government-wide cover-up of Saudi complicity in the affair.
Keep up with this story and more by subscribing now
In 2002, Tenet swore to Congress that he wasn't aware of the imminent threat because it came in a cable that wasn't marked urgentand "no one read it." But his story was shredded five years later when Senators Ron Wyden and Kit Bond forced loose an executive summary of the CIA's own internal investigation of 9/11, which stated that "some 50 to 60 individuals read one or more of the six Agency cables containing travel information related to these terrorists."
Clarke went ballistic. Until then, he had trusted Tenet, a close colleague and friend, to tell the truth. In 2009, despairing at the lack of media traction on the astounding disclosure, he wrote a book about the duplicity, Your Government Failed You, which was largely ignored. So when Duffy and Nowosielski came calling, he welcomed them.
"I believed, for the longest time, that this was one or two low-level desk officers who got this [information about Hazmi and Mihdhar] and somehow didn't realize the significance," he told them. But "50five oh50 CIA officersknew this, and they included [Tenet and] all kinds of people who were regularly talking to me? Saying I'm pissed doesn't begin to describe it."
All these years later, it's still unclear why the CIA would keep such crucial details about Al-Qaeda movements from the FBI. Clarke and other insiders suspect that the spy agency had a deeply compartmented plan in the works to recruit Hazmi, Mihdhar and perhaps other Al-Qaeda operatives as double agents. If the FBI discovered they were in California, the theory goes, it would have demanded their arrest. When the CIA's recruitment ploy fizzled, Tenet and company hid the details from Clarke lest they be accused of "malfeasance and misfeasance," he said.
It's the only logical explanation for why the presence of Hazmi and Mihdhar was kept from him until after the attacks, Clarke said. "They told us everythingexcept this," he says in the video.
Tenet and two of his counterterrorism deputies, Rich Blee and Cofer Black, issued a statement calling Clarke's theory "reckless and profoundly wrong." But now Clarke has company. Duffy and Nowosielski found other key former FBI counterterrorism agents and officials who have developed deep doubts about Tenet's story. The only element they disagree on is which officials were responsible for the alleged subterfuge.
"I think if there were some conscious effort" not to tell the bureau what was going on, Dale Watson, a former FBI deputy chief of counterterrorism told them, "it was probably" carried out below Tenet, Blee and Black, by managers of the CIA's Osama bin Laden unit.
But Pat D'Amuro, an even more senior former FBI counterterrorism official, told them, "There's no doubt in my mind that [withholding the information] went up further in the agency" than those managers. "And why they didn't send it over, to this day, I don't know why."
And then there's the continuing mystery of Saudi complicity with the hijackers. Duffy and Nowosielski offer a tightly focused update on what's been learned about Saudi support for Al-Qaeda in recent years. Back in 2004, the official 9/11 Commission said it found no evidence that the "Saudi government as an institution, or senior Saudi officials individually funded" Al-Qaeda.
A year later, the highly redacted CIA inspector general's report cracked open another window, saying that some agency officers had "speculated" that "dissident sympathizers within the government" (i.e., religious extremists) may have supported bin Laden. Subsequent investigations have revealed that officials from the kingdom's Islamic affairs ministry were actively helping the hijackers get settled in California.
Such information spurred several hundred families of the 9/11 attack victims to file suit against the Saudi government in federal court in New York last year, seeking unspecified monetary damages.
"Saudi intelligence has admitted that they knew who these two guys were," Andrew Maloney, an attorney for families, told Newsweeklast week. "They knew they were Al-Qaeda the day they arrived in Los Angeles. So any notion from the Saudi government saying, Oh, we just help out all Saudis here' is false. They knew. And the CIA knew."
The kingdom has turned over some 6,800 pages of documents, "mostly in Arabic," that Maloney's team is in the process of translating. "There's some interesting things in there," he said, "and some clear gaps." He said he'll return to court in October to press for more documents.
He also wants to depose Saudi officials, particularly Fahad al-Thumairy, a former Los Angeles consular official and imam of a Culver City, California, mosque attended by the hijackers. In 2003, Thumairy was intercepted after he landed in Los Angeles on a flight from Germany and deported from the U.S. "because of suspected terrorist links." But he still works for the government in Riyadh, Maloney said. "Can you believe that?"
In April, Maloney subpoenaed the FBI for documents on Thumairy and Omar al-Bayoumi, a suspected Saudi spy in the U.S. who was also in contact with the hijackers. The bureau has not responded, so on September 11 he plans to file "a formal motion to compel the FBI" to produce the documents. His motion follows a sworn statement by Steven Moore, the FBI agent who headed the bureau's investigation into the hijacking of the plane that flew into the Pentagon, charging the 9/11 Commission with misleading the public when it said it "had not found evidence" of Saudi assistance to Hazmi and Mihdhar.
"There was clearly evidence that Thumairy provided assistance to Hazmi and Mihdhar," Moore wrote. And "based on the proof in our investigation," he added, "Bayoumi himself was a clandestine agent and associated with radical extremists, including Thumairy."
Moore's statement was first reported by the Florida Bulldog, a Fort Lauderdale news site that has been investigating the hijackers' contacts with flight schools. "To my knowledge," Moore stated, "Thumairy has never been the subject of a genuine law enforcement interview conducted by the actual agents who investigated him."
Maloney's additional targets are other FBI, CIA, State Department and Treasury Department personnel and documents. "There are a lot of people, former agentsI won't identify who or what agencieswho have talked to us," he said, but others, especially in the CIA's bin Laden unit, "will never talk to us or will only talk to us if they are given some kind of blanket immunity."
Getting access to them, he said, would probably require an executive order from President Donald Trumpan unlikely outcome given his administration's strong backing for the Saudi monarchy.
There may be public support for Maloney's endeavors. A 2016 poll found a slight majority of Americans (54.3 percent) believe that the government is hiding something about the 9/11 attacks. Then again, a considerable number of 9/11 "truthers" embrace conspiracy theories positing that the attacks were "an inside job" by the Bush administration and/or Israel and abetted by explosives planted in one of the World Trade Center towers.

[Image: gettyimages-924605998.jpg]The September 11 memorial in lower Manhattan. Spencer Platt/Getty Images But they are right about Saudi resistance to fully disclosing its relations with the hijackers. Last year, agents of the monarchy were discovered surreptitiously funding a PR effort to derail a congressional bill permitting a 9/11 families group to sue the kingdom for damages. Last September, the family group filed a 17-page complaint with the Justice Department.
Terry Strada, a leader of the group 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism, will mourn again this year, but not at the site where the towers once stood and her husband died. She plans to attend "a private service" at the Shrine of St. Joseph in Stirling, New Jersey, which she said has "a beautiful and solemn space" dedicated to all who died in the 9/11 attacks.
But she is also full of fury at the government's refusal to release all it knows about the run-up to the attacks. "It's very sad that we're still being kept in the dark about it. It's frustrating. It angers me," she told Newsweek. "It's a slap in the face. They think they're above the law and don't have to respond to the familiesand the world. It's disgusting."
But Strada evinces even more disdain for the Saudis.Responding to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's August 20 message "wishing Muslims around the world a blessed Eid al-Adha," she tweeted, "Seriously???"
Strada added, "The Saudis promote & finance the most virulent hatred toward Americans than any other nation. Murdered 3,000 on Sept 11." The "9/11 families," she wrote, "will #NEVERFORGET. #FreeTheTruth"
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
More useful but somehow off target soft LIHOP stuff from the Press for Truth guys.

Quote:Then again, a considerable number of 9/11 "truthers" embrace conspiracy theories positing that the attacks were "an inside job" by the Bush administration and/or Israel and abetted by explosives planted in one of the World Trade Center towers.

Thanks Newsweek. I can't think of anyone who feels certain that explosives were planted in the WTC, other than a couple of thousand architects and engineers, and anyone who has bothered to look at the evidence.

And I'm assuming the cops who arrested those five guys high-fiving on the Jersey shoreline as the towers dropped probably suspect Israel had some operational part to play in the day's events, particularly after their 2001 police report and interview transcript with those busy jerkoffs was redacted and then ordered sealed for a couple more decades.

Quote:But they are right about Saudi resistance to fully disclosing etc etc etc etc

Newsweek's point being - and maybe they should write another thirty stories pushing this narrative in case their slower or newer readers missed the message - that researchers who think there is something to the subjects quoted up top are wrong about everything else. Thanks again Newsweek.

I'm assuming that despite financial losses Newsweek will still be published in 2021, to cover two important events, the tenth anniversary of the 'death of Bin Laden' in May 2021, and the twentieth anniversary of the day's events in September of that year. So, a whole bunch of newcomers and folks who have forgotten the weirder aspects of the official story will need a big refresher. Youtube will really need to get their comment trolls ready for that day, as the side comments from people still bugged by things like the death of Barry Jennings, or how James Woolsey and Judith Miller developed enough predictive powers to participate in anthrax attack drills a few months prior to the real ones, will surely require a new bunch of debunking comments to get folks to look the other way.
Hopefully David Frasca is in the book
Yeah, some interesting stuff would be useful. I don't want to write the volume off, I just wince a little when these tell-all volumes seem to delicately avoid documented stuff that doesn't fit their careful narrative.

I'd forgotten about the Randy Glass episode - there's a decent chapter on it in Sander Hicks' THE BIG WEDDING.

I'll post the PNAC-specific quotes from PROPHETS OF WAR in the Norm Augustine thread I started later this week. There's no way Augustine was in the dark as to what was likely coming. The article I reprinted just makes that notion more suggestive. He even chucked a 9/11 reference into the text.

2005: Two Planes Hijacked on 9/11 Are Still Listed as Active'

[Image: edit.png]

Two of the aircraft that were hijacked and destroyed in the 9/11 attacks are still listed in the Federal Aviation Administration's aircraft registry as "active" four years after the attacks occurred. This information will only come to light in 2017, when the Boston Globe reports it following a 12-month investigation of FAA practices. The Globe will not state which of the four aircraft that were hijacked on September 11, 2001, are still listed as active this year. [BOSTON GLOBE, 9/23/2017; CBS NEWS, 9/25/2017]Registered aircraft are identified by a registration number, also known as the "N-number," which always begins with the letter N and is displayed on the aircraft's tail or fuselage. [CNN, 12/10/2010; BOSTON GLOBE, 9/23/2017][/FONT]
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dr. Judy Wood's Book 'Where Did The Towers Go?' Peter Lemkin 8 20,899 05-04-2022, 10:57 AM
Last Post: O. Austrud
  The Saudi connections to strange terrorist events in the USA Peter Lemkin 0 1,824 09-12-2019, 06:20 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Anthrax Deception - by Graeme MacQueen - New Book on the Anthrax 'attacks'. Peter Lemkin 20 49,466 01-08-2019, 01:27 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  The Secret History of 911 & War of Terror Peter Lemkin 18 61,677 15-10-2018, 07:01 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Saudi Connections To 911 are Complex and Murky... Peter Lemkin 4 8,261 30-03-2018, 10:40 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New David Ray Griffin book forthcoming Anthony Thorne 0 8,053 27-06-2017, 01:07 PM
Last Post: Anthony Thorne
  Why did the Secret Service Leave the President and a School Full of Children in Danger on 9/11? Anthony Thorne 0 3,849 18-03-2017, 01:03 PM
Last Post: Anthony Thorne
  Saudi Blackmail Obama over 9/11 David Guyatt 31 20,832 25-05-2016, 08:00 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  US Senate passes bill allowing Sept. 11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia Drew Phipps 3 4,419 18-05-2016, 09:27 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Peter Dale Scott on WhoWhatWhy - The Secret Cheney Operation on 9/11 Anthony Thorne 5 4,740 15-09-2015, 10:19 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)