COVID-19 AS A BLACK OP

[Lauren Johnson]

I find it somewhat pointless at this time to speculate on the current virus epidemic having been a black operation, as I have yet to see any evidence that it was. Is it now possible to genetically manipulate a virus? - answer: yes. But if it was [and a recently published paper says best anyone can tell in the field of genetic manipulation, there is no evidence of the genone having been manipulated], it is an own goal bioweapon. So, one can use the fall back that it escaped from a lab, but again we don't yet have any evidence. Are there cretins who work in bioweapons who would think to create such as thing? again - yes; but I think they'd make one that would target a population and leave themselves immune - and not kill 2% [approx.] of everyone almost equally [and older persons and those with pre-existing conditions most susceptible]. So, possible and doable - but no evidence yet; and I see no point in debating something that is possible, but seems illogical and has no evidence yet. 911 and Dallas, to name but two, have LOTS of clear EVIDENCE of being black ops and having had a clear objective for doing so. If this was done on purpose, it was a suicide mission to destroy hundreds of millions, when there are bioweapons that could kill nearly everyone or even everyone.

You are certainly welcome to not consider the possibility.  From my POV, I think we would be remiss not to look for faint or not so faint traces of deep state actions.  Remember, we are only in the early stages of this virus.  As time passes, there may be other perspectives that come forth.  Case in point: the Oklahoma City bombing.  Think of all the stages we went through in understanding this event.  And now, I believe you have concluded that it was a trial run for the 9/11 attacks.  

Regarding the question of an own goal.  We don't know the scope of this supposed operation -- if it is one, of course.  We really have to wait to see how big and to whom it impacts the most.  But causing chaos is a well known technique for advancing goals.

I suppose you have seen the strange reference in a Dean Koontz novel to a strange virus that sweeps the world.  Don't bother debunking because Swopes has done a great job.  


[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon)][color=var(--posttitletextcolor)]1981 Dean Koontz Novel...eerily depicting a similar virus called ‘Wuhan’ in China like the Coronavirus today.[/color]


Discussion

112 Comments
Give Award
Share
SaveHideReport



97% Upvoted[/color]
[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText)]Comment as [color=var(--newCommunityTheme-linkText)]lj7980[/color]


[/color]

[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyAlpha50)]COMMENT[/color]

[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-button)]
[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-linkText)]Markdown mode[/color][/color]

[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)]SORT BY
[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-linkText)]BEST[/color][/color]
[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-linkText)]View discussions in 1 other community[/color]


level 1
[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText)][color=var(--newCommunityTheme-bodyText)]0utkast_band

[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)]81 points[/color][color=var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)]·[/color][color=var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)]1 month ago[/color][color=var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)]·[/color][color=var(--newCommunityTheme-metaText)]edited 1 month ago[/color]
[/color]
The original story has a different city and the virus has a different name.
EDIT: this seems to be blowing up, so I did some more research on it (apart from visiting the first Google result which appears to be Snopes, haha. I am not a US person, so I did not know it’s not a credible source, I apologize for that! TIL!)
Apparently, there have been multiple iterations on the book, and in 2008 Dean Koontz did change it with regard to the virus. It used to originate from Gorki (a city in Russia), and this was changed for Wuhan.
This makes sense because there is a virology institute there ([color=var(--newCommunityTheme-linkText)]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan_Institute_of_Virology). Also, in 2008 Wuhan starting appearing in the news because of the 2008 Summer Olympics which was held in China.
I personally believe all this is a logical explanation for the fact expressed in this post. Dean heard about Wuhan, did some research, and decided it would be more fitting for the book.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--newCommunityTheme-actionIcon)]Reply[/color]

[Lauren Johnson]

The "Own Goal" rationale for ruling out the possibility of the intentional releasing and spreading of the COVID-19 virus although persuasive at first glance does not hold up when examined more closely.

The logic of OG critique is that no rational actor would unleash such a bio-weapon that would potentially kill the attacker.  The best refutation is the work of the two volumes by Docherty and Macgregor, Hidden History and Conjuring Hitler by Guido Preparata arose from the secret societies spawned by Rhodes and Milner, which became the inspiration of what we now call the Anglo-American Empire.  Docherty and Macgregor argue that WWI was conjured by the machinations of banking and industrial elites.  Preparata extends the argument to include the creation of WWII.  

Obviously, I argue that the virus as a bio-weapon should be considered in the context of previous examples of unleashing chaos and death.

[Lauren Johnson]

I am quoting the opening paragraphs of Whitney Webb's multi-part series on some rather dark connections in the COVID PANDEMIC. and then quoting the rest of her first articleS in a new thread.  Her multi-part series on Jeffrey Epstein should be a book.  This series could end up being the another not-in-print book.  

Source: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/...rk-winter/

During the presidency of George H.W. Bush in the early 1990s, something disturbing unfolded at the U.S.’ top biological warfare research facility at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Specimens of highly contagious and deadly pathogens – anthrax and ebola among them – had disappeared from the lab, at a time when lab workers and rival scientists had been accused of targeted sexual and ethnic harassment and several disgruntled researchers had left as a result.

In addition to missing samples of anthrax, ebola, hanta virus and a variant of AIDS, two of the missing specimens had been labeled “unknown” – “an Army euphemism for classified research whose subject was secret,” according to reports. The vast majority of the specimens lost were never found and an Army spokesperson would later claim that it was “likely some were simply thrown out with the trash.”

An internal Army inquiry in 1992 would reveal that one employee, Lt. Col. Philip Zack, had been caught on camera secretly entering the lab to conduct “unauthorized research, apparently involving anthrax,” the Hartford Courant would later report. Despite this, Zack would continue to do infectious disease research for pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and would collaborate with the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) throughout the 1990s.

The Courant had also noted that: “A numerical counter on a piece of lab equipment had been rolled back to hide work done by the mystery researcher [later revealed to be Zack], who left the misspelled label ‘antrax’ in the machine’s electronic memory.” The Courant’s report further detailed the extremely lax security controls and chaotic disorganization that then characterized the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) lab in Fort Detrick.

This same lab would, a decade later, be officially labeled as the source of the anthrax spores responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks, attacks which are also officially said to have been the work of a “deranged” USAMRIID researcher, despite initially having been blamed on Saddam Hussein and Iraq by top government officials and mainstream media. Those attacks killed 5 Americans and sickened 17.

Yet, as the investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks unfolded, accusations from major U.S. newspapers soon emerged that the FBI was deliberately sabotaging the probe to protect the Anthrax attacker and that the CIA and U.S. military intelligence had refused to cooperate with the investigation. The FBI did not officially close their investigation into the 2001 anthrax attacks, nicknamed “Amerithrax,” until 2010 and aspects of that investigation still remain classified.

More recently, this past July, the same Fort Detrick lab would be shut down by the CDC, after it was found that researchers “did not maintain an accurate or current inventory” for toxins and “failed to safeguard against unauthorized access to select agents.” The closure of the lab for its numerous breaches of biosafety protocols would be hidden from Congress and the facility would controversially be partially reopened last November before all of the identified biosafety issues were resolved.

The same day that the lab was controversially allowed to partially reopen, which was the result of heavy lobbying from the Pentagon, local news outlets reported that the lab had suffered “two breaches of containment” last year, though the nature of those breaches and the pathogens involved were redacted in the inspection findings report obtained by the Frederick News Post. Notably, USAMRIID has, since the 1980s, worked closely with virologists and virology labs in Wuhan, China, where the first epicenter of the current novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) cases emerged. The Chinese government has since alleged that the virus had been brought to China by members of the U.S. military, members of which attended the World Military Games in the country last October.

Such similarities among these Fort Detrick lab breaches, from the early 1990s to 2001 to the present, may be nothing more than unfortunate coincidences that are the result of a stubborn federal government and military that have repeatedly refused to enforce the necessary stringent safety precautions on the nation’s top biological warfare laboratory.
Yet, upon examining not only these biosafety incidents at Fort Detrick, but the 2001 Anthrax attacks and the current Covid-19 outbreak, another odd commonality stands out — high-level war games exercise took place in June 2001 that eerily predicted not only the Anthrax attacks, but also the initial government narrative of those attacks and much, much more.

That June 2001 exercise, known as “Dark Winter,” also predicted many aspects of government pandemic response that would later re-emerge in last October’s simulation “Event 201,” which predicted a global pandemic caused by a novel Coronavirus just months before the Covid-19 outbreak. In addition, the U.S. government would lead its own multi-part series of pandemic simulations, called “Crimson Contagion,” that would also predict aspects of the Covid-19 outbreak and government response.
Upon further investigation, key leaders of both Event 201 and Crimson Contagion, not only have deep and longstanding ties to U.S. Intelligence and the U.S. Department of Defense, they were all previously involved in that same June 2001 exercise, Dark Winter. Some of these same individuals would also play a role in the FBI’s “sabotaged” investigation into the subsequent Anthrax attacks and are now handling major aspects of the U.S. government’s response to the Covid-19 crisis. One of those individuals, Robert Kadlec, was recently put in charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) entire Covid-19 response efforts, despite the fact that he was recently and directly responsible for actions that needlessly infected Americans with Covid-19.

Other major players in Dark Winter are now key drivers behind the “biodefense” mass surveillance programs currently being promoted as a technological solution to Covid-19’s spread, despite evidence that such programs actually worsen pandemic outbreaks. Others still have close connections to the insider trading that recently occurred among a select group of U.S. Senators regarding the economic impact of Covid-19 and are set to personally profit from lucrative contracts to develop not just one, but the majority, of experimental Covid-19 treatments and vaccines currently under development by U.S. companies.

This investigative series, entitled “Engineering Contagion: Amerithrax, Coronavirus and the Rise of the Biotech-Industrial Complex,” will examine these disturbing parallels between the 2001 anthrax attacks and the current scandals and “solutions” of the Covid-19 crisis as well as the simulations that eerily preceded both events. By tracing key actors in Dark Winter from 2001 to the present, it is also possible to trace the corruption that has lurked behind U.S. “biodefense” and pandemic preparedness efforts for decades and which now is rearing its ugly head as pandemic panic distracts the American and global public from the fundamentally untrustworthy, and frankly dangerous, individuals who are in control of the U.S. government’s and corporate America’s response. 

Given their involvement in Dark Winter and, more recently, Event 201 and Crimson Contagion, this series seeks to explore the possibility that, just like the 2001 anthrax attacks, government insiders had foreknowledge of the Covid-19 crisis on a scale that, thus far, has gone unreported and that those same insiders are now manipulating the government’s response and public panic in order to reap record profits and gain unprecedented power for themselves and control over people’s lives.