Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Isreaeli Media, here blogger
#1
This kind of talking makes me mad as hell.
http://cgis.jpost.com/Blogs/dershowitz/e..._ok_for_us[/FONT]

Do I read there:
Quote:Targeted killings, like most other military actions in densely populated areas, will inevitably lead to some civilian deaths, but Israel has taken action to reduce the ratio of civilian to terrorist deaths to the lowest point in history for comparable actions.
The Israeli Supreme Court has limited targeted killing to those engaged in terrorism. They would never permit it to be used against drug traffickers or those who would not qualify as combatants.
There will be some criticism of the US, but not condemnations - no draft of Resolution, boycott or divestment.
There will not even be the type of criticism directed against Israel by the likes of former UK foreign secretary Jack Straw, who declared: "The British government has made it repeatedly clear that so-called 'targeted assassinations' of this kind are unlawful, unjustified and counter-productive."
Similarly, the French Foreign Ministry stated: France "declares once again that extrajudicial executions contravene international law and are unacceptable."
The Italian Foreign Minister joined this chorus of criticism, stating: "Italy, like the whole of the European Union, has always condemned the practice of targeted assassinations."
Martin S. Indyk, a previous American ambassador to Israel, was also open in criticizing Israel's targeted killings when he said: "The United States government is very clearly on the record as against targeted assassinations... They are extrajudicial killings, and we do not support that."
Former US Secretary of State Colin Powell said, "We continue to express our distress and opposition to these kinds of targeted killings and we will continue to do so."
What is unclear is whether these statements, when considered in the light of the recent announcement that drug traffickers are to be targeted for killing by US troops and drones, reflects a change in American policy, or is simply another example of the double standard applied against Israel. It certainly looks like the latter.
The double standard displayed by the world makes a mockery of universal human rights and international humanitarian law. Neither will retain any degree of credibility if the operating principle is "rights for me, but not for thee."
While the author is correct in his assessment that there is no real criticism of american drone strikes, the whole tone of this article suggests that there should be the same standards in the law (correct), so let's give Israel a free hand also (very incorrect).

Let me make one thing very clear: Targeted killings, by whomever, are a blatant violation of ALL human rights, international law, criminal justice and UN charta. In case of the US, this also makes it a violation of the US constitution, which makes it an impeachable offense.
It is about the lowest act morally, short of starting an unprovoked war.

So the difference in reaction between US and Israel doing similar things to me seems to stem from the different level of international media control that both have.

BTW, the comments to this piece from readers, mostly jewish, makes me shiver.

Carsten :mad:
The most relevant literature regarding what happened since September 11, 2001 is George Orwell's "1984".
Reply
#2
That's rich--Alan Dershowitz lecturing others about double standards.

Israel's disgusting selfishness and misguided belief that they are God's chosen people has now evolved into a full blown malignant psychosis. I cite the bloggers comments at the end of the linked article (and many others) as irrefutable evidence. The fanatacism on display proves Israel has slipped over the edge. The Israeli public fervently believes that any crime against others is fully justifiable because they, as God's people, sit above the rest of humanity. They are as crazy, and more dangerous, than any Moonies or Orange cultists from days past.

While the planet groans from overpopulation, Israel encourages settlers to steal more land from a people demoralised and devestated by 60 years of Israeli cruelty and selfishness. While Israel claims eternal victim status, they openly assassinate troublesome dissenters in defiance of all the rules of civilised society.

Peace and two state solutions are a cruel fantasy, a fact now dawning on Barack Obama, imo.

A full blown war in the ME is inevitable.

Israel is the new Nazi Germany.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  John Pilger on the "complicit enablers" of war in the media David Guyatt 2 10,559 18-03-2019, 08:09 AM
Last Post: James Lewis
  Deep State, Deep Politics & The Deeply Compliant Media David Guyatt 2 13,959 12-03-2017, 08:09 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  The Chilling Hypocrisy of the NYT's and the US Media David Guyatt 1 10,758 12-02-2017, 11:01 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  Media coverage of events in Syria. Magda Hassan 32 46,193 20-12-2016, 02:34 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Why the Mainstream Media is Freaking Out David Guyatt 0 5,657 14-12-2016, 11:41 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  War by media and the triumph of propaganda - John Pilger Peter Lemkin 7 5,117 07-12-2014, 04:47 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Great Film About The American Propaganda-Media-National Security-Corporate Complex Peter Lemkin 2 4,947 15-10-2014, 07:20 PM
Last Post: R.K. Locke
  American Militarism and Anti-Militarism in Popular Media, 1945-1970 Tracy Riddle 0 2,369 03-10-2014, 03:14 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  How the media conned the public into loving the FBI Tracy Riddle 0 1,951 27-05-2014, 01:20 AM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Chris Hedges On The Current Media War and a few other things..... Peter Lemkin 2 5,471 03-05-2014, 09:14 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)