30-01-2010, 07:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-01-2010, 08:16 PM by Geoff Heinricks.)
As it seems that most researchers now recognize and advocate the case for a well-planned US Military & Intelligence coup against the Kennedy administration in Dallas, I always like to remind people of the study and planning that went into the scenario, and show new eyes the importance of that ridiculous turn onto Elm.
Below is a silly little narrative of a very famous WWII assassination that was declassified on the CIA site.
"Why have we chosen this particular spot on the road?"
"Sir, there is a sharp curve. His car and the motorcycles must slow down to twenty kilometers."
"How many motorcycles, Kubis?"
"Probably two, sir. We'll find out."
The_place_where_Reinhard_Heydrich_was_killed.jpg
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-t...p_0001.htm
I'm just getting back up to speed on witness statements etc., but the early strike behind the limo (which Posner made such a show of trying to explain away) was I believe the prime killing space: slowest speed and greatest vulnerability. That's why you have the wide turn. I suspect silenced weapons (the Delisle carbine being my favourite suspect).
Whatever has happened with William Reymond and his viewing of an unaltered Zapruder? If Reymond was right in saying that the evidence is that Greer, in taking the turn way too wide (understandable, as it was against all security protocol) screwed up the sight lines for the first fusilade, then the back up zone scenarios further up Elm make a lot of sense.
In looking at the available and immediately 'reliable' testimonies about the ballistics, the high number of shots always seemed to be divided along the order of:
1) a few teams firing on synchronized control with regular weapons for scenario sound cover.
2) a few teams firing on own time 'best shot' principle with suppressed discharge weapons.
Anyway, there were going to be no chances taken. There was to be no room for failure, as there nearly was with Reinhard.
Below is a silly little narrative of a very famous WWII assassination that was declassified on the CIA site.
"Why have we chosen this particular spot on the road?"
"Sir, there is a sharp curve. His car and the motorcycles must slow down to twenty kilometers."
"How many motorcycles, Kubis?"
"Probably two, sir. We'll find out."
The_place_where_Reinhard_Heydrich_was_killed.jpg
https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-t...p_0001.htm
I'm just getting back up to speed on witness statements etc., but the early strike behind the limo (which Posner made such a show of trying to explain away) was I believe the prime killing space: slowest speed and greatest vulnerability. That's why you have the wide turn. I suspect silenced weapons (the Delisle carbine being my favourite suspect).
Whatever has happened with William Reymond and his viewing of an unaltered Zapruder? If Reymond was right in saying that the evidence is that Greer, in taking the turn way too wide (understandable, as it was against all security protocol) screwed up the sight lines for the first fusilade, then the back up zone scenarios further up Elm make a lot of sense.
In looking at the available and immediately 'reliable' testimonies about the ballistics, the high number of shots always seemed to be divided along the order of:
1) a few teams firing on synchronized control with regular weapons for scenario sound cover.
2) a few teams firing on own time 'best shot' principle with suppressed discharge weapons.
Anyway, there were going to be no chances taken. There was to be no room for failure, as there nearly was with Reinhard.