Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A new theory of the assassination
#21
Anthony Marsh Wrote:I don't see any other appropriate thread about theories about who was behind it, so I'll leave this here. My own theory came about by serendipity. I was researching the limousine damage and trying to track down a rumor of a bullet hole in the floor. So, I looked up an article in Time from 1964. And I noticed a theory which was very widespread in France.
The theory is that the CIA learned about a plot to kill President Kennedy and intentionally let it happen. They knew about a threat to kill JFK and intentionally did not notify the Secret Service.
Then Jean Davison wrote in Oswald's Game that Hoover told the Warren Commission that they knew from a source that Castro had complained in his inner circle that Oswald had made a threat to kill President Kennedy when he was at the Cuban Embassy in Mexico City and Castro saw it as a provocation to try to link Cuba to the assassination. Either the CIA had its own sources in the Cuban Embassy such as Duran or they had room bugs so that they also HEARD Oswald making that threat to assassinate President Kennedy, but intentionally withheld that from the Secret Service. They could justify doing that to protect sources and methods. The Warren Commission never made that public.

You may also see the work of John Armstrong, which makes a VERY strong case for two Oswalds, at least. And, not only did the CIA know about a plot, so did J. Edgar's FBI.
Reply
#22
Anthony Marsh Wrote:I don't see any other appropriate thread about theories about who was behind it, so I'll leave this here. My own theory came about by serendipity. I was researching the limousine damage and trying to track down a rumor of a bullet hole in the floor. So, I looked up an article in Time from 1964. And I noticed a theory which was very widespread in France.
The theory is that the CIA learned about a plot to kill President Kennedy and intentionally let it happen. They knew about a threat to kill JFK and intentionally did not notify the Secret Service.

The problem with this is not exactly uncommon to even the best and brightest of JFK researchers' works.

The CIA is a tool, not the carpenter.

In turn, the carpenter is not the architect.

And the architect is not the homeowner.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum

If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods

You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless.  All you can do is control them or eliminate them.  Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Reply
#23
Charles Drago Wrote:The CIA is a tool, not the carpenter.

In turn, the carpenter is not the architect.

And the architect is not the homeowner.


[Image: Holmes-on-Homes-Season-1.jpg]
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply
#24
"A mansion has many rooms. . .I was not privy to who struck John."
Reply
#25
Phil Dragoo Wrote:"A mansion has many rooms. . .I was not privy to who struck John."

As offered by the literato James.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum

If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods

You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless.  All you can do is control them or eliminate them.  Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Reply
#26
Quote:
As offered by the literato James.

Hunt and Phillips wrote. Richard Condon wrote. But when JJ wrote, it took years to find the typewriter.

Ripples in ponds having reposed.
Reply
#27
Well, Mr. Angleton would know who struck John...seeing that Oswald more than likely worked for CIA counter-intelligence, as Lisa Pease very effectively argued in Probe magazine and The Assassinations.
Reply
#28
James Jesus Angleton
and the Kennedy Assassination
http://www.ctka.net/pr700-ang.html

James Jesus Angleton
and the Kennedy Assassination, Part II
http://www.ctka.net/pr900-ang.html
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  News on the Old Assassination Peter Lemkin 1 2,184 04-06-2025, 07:27 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Current State Of Internet Assassination Discussion Brian Doyle 0 1,085 23-08-2024, 07:27 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  JFK Assassination: Sequence of Events ThomasPickering 5 4,689 20-07-2022, 12:58 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  On the Trail of Clay Shaw:The Italian Undercover CIA and Mossad Station and the Assassination of JFK Paz Marverde 4 7,302 28-11-2019, 12:32 PM
Last Post: Paz Marverde
  Weisberg's trash-the-critics book 'Inside the Assassination Industry' Richard Booth 7 8,112 28-09-2019, 12:41 AM
Last Post: Richard Booth
  Mailer's Tales of the JFK Assassination Milo Reech 4 6,144 07-06-2019, 09:47 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Collins Radio Connection to JFK Assassination - Bill Kelly (revised) Peter Lemkin 15 14,000 20-05-2019, 09:08 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  John Barbour: Averill Harriman ordered the assassination Lauren Johnson 30 39,310 18-03-2019, 05:01 PM
Last Post: Cliff Varnell
  The Inheritance: Poisoned Fruit of JFK's Assassination Lauren Johnson 1 4,102 09-02-2019, 06:02 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  The Key To a Successful Assassination is Control of Communications..... Peter Lemkin 0 3,321 21-01-2019, 06:30 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)