Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Even The Stayed Admit Pakistani ISI & Taliban 2 Peas In Pod
#1
London school of economics says “Taliban is official policy of ISI"
[Surprise, surprise, surprise!....]
Posted on Jun 13th, 2010.

A report published by London School of Economics, a leading institute in Britain, accused Pakistani military intelligence of having official representation in Taliban’s leadership council and thus having significant influence in its operations. Report also said that Taliban was the “official policy” of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) and ISI funds and trains Taliban fighters.

This report can raise more concerns in the West over Pakistan’s commitment to help end the war in Afghanistan and fight terrorism. Western forces are already suspecting links between the ISI and militants.

The report further said that Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistani President, have visited senior Taliban prisoners in Pakistan earlier this year, where he is believed to have promised their release and help for militant operations, suggesting support for the Taliban “is approved at the highest level of Pakistan’s civilian government.”

The report also said “Pakistan continues to give extensive support to the insurgency in terms of funding, munitions and supplies.” Report claimed that this fact is based on interviews with Taliban commanders in some of the most violent regions in Afghanistan.

“These accounts were corroborated by former Taliban ministers, a Western analyst and a senior UN official based in Kabul, who said the Taliban largely depend on funding from the ISI and groups in Gulf countries,” the report said.

“Pakistan appears to be playing a double-game of astonishing magnitude,” said the report, based on interviews with Taliban commanders and former senior Taliban ministers as well as Western and Afghan security officials.

A Pakistani diplomatic source denied the accusations and described that report as “naive,” and also said it is up to the Afghan government to have any talks with the Taliban.

------------------
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]No surprises here and not new [except to MSM and most unwashed...]. It is odd that this story was 'broken' on the BBC today and that does make me wonder what is behind the 'break'.....apply negative template?!....be prepared for worse?...be prepared for new attack on Pakistan?.....apply shock doctrine? .......other?...... stay tuned....

As to who controls the pod these two 'peas' sit in, IMO that would be the USA's 'sphere of influence'.....[/COLOR]
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply
#2
Last time I checked, the LSE - namely the London School of Economics - was officially a university dedicated to teaching economics.

Here's wiki on the LSE:

Quote:The London School of Economics and Political Science, commonly referred to as the London School of Economics or LSE, is a specialist constituent college of the University of London in London, England. Founded in 1895 by Fabian Society members Sidney Webb, Beatrice Webb and George Bernard Shaw,[6] the School joined the federal University of London in 1900 as the Faculty of Economics. Degrees were issued to the school's students from 1902 onwards. Today, it remains a specialist single-faculty constituent college of the University with 8,700 full-time students.[7] It describes itself as the world's leading social science institution for teaching and research, which spans the full breadth of the social sciences.

On what basis then do LSE professors have the credentials to assert the following?:

Quote:A report published by London School of Economics, a leading institute in Britain, accused Pakistani military intelligence of having official representation in Taliban’s leadership council and thus having significant influence in its operations. Report also said that Taliban was the “official policy” of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) and ISI funds and trains Taliban fighters.

I think the LSE just outed itself as a part of the military-intelligence-multinational-complex. :bebored:
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#3
Jan, You may have gotten a 'bingo'....with that observation....but the BBC's involvement in making it their lead story today is odd...but then so is the BBC...:afraid:
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Taliban Magda Hassan 0 2,505 14-11-2009, 06:20 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)