Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
OBAMA DECLASSIFIES PORTION OF 1968 PRESIDENT'S DAILY BRIEF; Secrecy News ;Steve Aftergood Reort
#1
Secrecy News Blog: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/


** OBAMA DECLASSIFIES PORTION OF 1968 PRESIDENT'S DAILY BRIEF
** SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT ON LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP
** A LOOK AT FEDERAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION (CRS)


OBAMA DECLASSIFIES PORTION OF 1968 PRESIDENT'S DAILY BRIEF

In a small but momentous shift in national security secrecy policy, President Obama personally ordered the declassification last month of a short paragraph regarding the Soviet space program that appeared in the President's Daily Brief dated November 26, 1968. The move came in response to a researcher's request that had been blocked by the Central Intelligence Agency for more than a decade.

The President's Daily Brief (PDB) is a compilation of intelligence that is presented to the President each day. It has long been considered sacrosanct by intelligence officials and has been effectively beyond the reach of Freedom of Information Act requesters and other researchers.

"The PDB is a unique intelligence product prepared specifically for the President of the United States to provide him with the most important current intelligence on critical issues relating to the national security of the United States," a CIA official wrote (pdf) in 2006.

"In the PDB, the intelligence community assembles the most sensitive intelligence information and the best analytic judgments in a complete, accurate, and timely package intended to inform the President and his most senior advisors as they make and implement the nation's defense and foreign policies.... The PDB is the most sensitive intelligence report produced by [the U.S. intelligence community]."

Based on that assessment, intelligence officials have successfully resisted and rebuffed FOIA requests, lawsuits and other public attempts to gain access to PDBs.

In the late 1990s, researcher Peter Pesavento identified several PDBs located at the Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library concerning the Soviet space program that were of interest to him and he filed a mandatory declassification review (MDR) request for their release. When his requests were denied by the CIA, he appealed the matter to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP), an executive branch body that considers appeals of MDR requests that have been denied. Remarkably, in 2003 the ISCAP granted Mr. Pesavento's appeal with respect to the one paragraph of the five-page PDB that discussed Soviet space (and even so one of the three sentences in the paragraph was partially redacted).

But then-Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet vetoed the ISCAP disclosure decision, making use of the new veto authority that had been granted to the DCI in President Bush's 2003 executive order on classification to block release of the PDB. Two members of the ISCAP appealed to the President to overturn the Tenet veto in 2003, but no action was taken on the appeal, until now.

"Please be advised that the President has directed the declassification and release of portions of the President's Daily Brief of November 26, 1968, that had been declassified by the Panel in its decision of September 2, 2003," wrote William A. Cira, executive secretary of the ISCAP in a May 26, 2011 letter (pdf) to Mr. Pesavento.

The declassified PDB paragraph, which will be released by Mr. Pesavento in a forthcoming article, is not very interesting to a non-specialist. It predicts that "the Soviets will not attempt a flight around the moon in December [1968]" but will probably wait until early 1969.

What makes the new disclosure significant is that it represents a decisive break from the intense and unyielding secrecy that with few exceptions has surrounded this class of documents.

In 2004, under pressure from the 9/11 Commission, President Bush released the famous PDB passage entitled "Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US" (pdf). But even in that case, DCI Tenet declared in his written declassification decision that the 2004 release to the 9/11 Commission "shall not be deemed to constitute any precedent concerning any future declassification or release of any other PDB."

By contrast, President Obama's declassification decision in this case does create a precedent that is all but certain to initiate a cascade of further releases of historical PDBs, beginning with several others on Soviet space that were also requested by Mr. Pesavento.

"In the coming months the Panel [ISCAP] will be adjudicating several similar President's Daily Brief appeals from you that the Panel has held in abeyance pending a decision on this issue," wrote Mr. Cira of ISCAP last month.

The declassification decision also gives new substance to two provisions in the Obama executive order on national security classification that were in danger of becoming mere rhetorical flourishes.

"[N]o information may be excluded from declassification... based solely on the type of document or record in which it is found," the President directed in executive order 13526, section 3.1g. That provision was presumed to apply to PDBs, and now we finally know that it does.

Also, the order stated in section 1.5d, "No information may remain classified indefinitely." Though this principle may seem like common sense, it has all too rarely been applied in practice.

A handful of other PDB texts have become public informally or inadvertently and have been published by the National Security Archive.


SELECTED ACQUISITION REPORT ON LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP

A status report on the Navy's development of the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) as of late last year is given in a Selected Acquisition Report (pdf) that was sent to Congress in April.

The word "littoral" means near the shore. The LCS is intended to counter small boat threats, mine laying vessels and coastal submarine threats.

Additional background on the LCS is available in a Congressional Research Service report entitled "Navy Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program: Background, Issues and Options for Congress" (pdf).


A LOOK AT FEDERAL GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION (CRS)

Policy issues surrounding the use of geospatial information are examined in two new reports from the Congressional Research Service.

"Geospatial information is data referenced to a place--a set of geographic coordinates--which can often be gathered, manipulated, and displayed in real time. A Geographic Information System (GIS) is a computer data system capable of capturing, storing, analyzing, and displaying geographically referenced information."

"The federal government and policy makers increasingly use geospatial information and tools like GIS for producing floodplain maps, conducting the census, mapping foreclosures, congressional redistricting, and responding to natural hazards such as wildfires, earthquakes, and tsunamis. For policy makers, this type of analysis can greatly assist in clarifying complex problems that may involve local, state, and federal government, and affect businesses, residential areas, and federal installations."

See "Geospatial Information and Geographic Information Systems (GIS): An Overview for Congress" (pdf), May 18, 2011, and "Issues and Challenges for Federal Geospatial Information" (pdf), May 18, 2011.


_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html
Reply
#2
Quote:The declassified PDB paragraph, which will be released by Mr. Pesavento in a forthcoming article, is not very interesting to a non-specialist. It predicts that "the Soviets will not attempt a flight around the moon in December [1968]" but will probably wait until early 1969.

What makes the new disclosure significant is that it represents a decisive break from the intense and unyielding secrecy that with few exceptions has surrounded this class of documents.

My response to this is simple and Anglo-Saxon: BOLLOCKS!

The release of an entirely uninteresting paragraph, classified by DCIA for no reason other than sphincter blockage, does not "represent a decisive break from.... intense and unyielding secrecy".
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War."

Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon

"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta."
The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
Reply
#3
Indeed, Jan, it does quite the opposite.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Knock Your Head Against NARA Wall Of Silence & Secrecy Peter Lemkin 0 11,561 09-12-2013, 08:57 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Secrecy News Bernice Moore 0 11,551 24-01-2012, 12:36 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  the FAS Project on Government Secrecy Bernice Moore 0 11,146 19-01-2012, 07:46 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Secrecy News Bernice Moore 0 10,964 03-01-2012, 06:51 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Secrecy News Bernice Moore 0 10,355 21-12-2011, 03:02 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  WHEN DOES PUBLIC DISCLOSURE MAKE SECRECY MOOT? Secrecy News Bernice Moore 0 7,026 09-12-2011, 08:42 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Secrecy Newa Bernice Moore 0 4,027 05-12-2011, 09:52 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Secrec7y News...Iran contra at 25:reagan and bush 'criminal liability' evaluations Bernice Moore 0 2,962 26-11-2011, 02:51 PM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Secrecy News Bernice Moore 0 2,942 15-11-2011, 01:35 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore
  Secrecy news Bernice Moore 0 2,747 09-11-2011, 06:49 AM
Last Post: Bernice Moore

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)