Most Likely Places for a New 9/11

[James Lewis]

I don't know if this has been posted anywhere, but it's a fascinating analysis of the most likely places that another false flag i.e. 9/11 could happen. And Houston being No. 1 is quite interesting considering the hooks that BP has in the petroleum industry there.

False Flag Prospects, 2008 -- Top Three US Target Cities

by Captain Eric H. May


The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out. As I'll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 "terror" attacks, which were in reality government attacks blamed on "terrorists."

Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I'll keep it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better.

My aim, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to convince the American people that the "next 9/11" -- constantly promised by officials and the media -- is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises cannot "go live" and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against.

Military Exercises

The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the 7/7, 2005 attacks in the United Kingdom both have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants. Each country's government was conducting military exercises that simulated the exact events that were to occur.

The US 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who was present in Cheney's famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward Washington, DC. Cheney was at the center of national military exercises simulating terrorist hijackings of US aircraft -- at the very time that those hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003, Secretary Mineta testified:

"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"

9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on the bombshell revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to YouTube, Mineta's astounding revelation and Hamilton's amazing reaction are both viewable on a three minute clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

In the case of the 7/7 London railway bombings, there is same-day evidence in a BBC interview with former Scotland Yard anti-terrorism agent, Peter Power, who was a contract employee working in government exercises:

POWER: "At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now."

BBC HOST: "To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?"

POWER: "Precisely."

For a one minute excerpt containing the statements above, refer to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc

Mainstream Media

It goes without saying that serious media inquiry would quickly ferret out the facts demonstrating high treason in the cases of 9/11 and 7/7. It also goes without saying, unfortunately, that the traitors behind the two false flag attacks understood this very well, and would not have done what they did without a green light from a collaborative media.

Three World Trade Center buildings collapsed in New York City on September 11, 2001: WTC 1 and WTC 2 (the Twin Towers) in the morning, and WTC 7 (the Salomon Building) at 5:20 p.m. EST. Given that all three buildings were said to be unexpected collapses by all official sources, there is no good reason -- except for complicity -- to explain how it is that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes before it happened:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29g...re=related

Fox news damned itself by announcing that WTC 7 had collapsed -- even as it showed a live shot of downtown New York with WTC 7 still standing. A few seconds later the building collapsed, understandably confusing the newscasters:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwUJ9MhzgK

The owner of all three buildings was Larry Silverstein, who had recently doubled the insurance value of the Twin Towers. Amazingly, "Lucky Larry," later stated in a PBS interview that he and the New York Fire Department agreed to a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Since skyscrapers are not wired for demolition -- unless someone intends to demolish them -- Silverstein's statement is an admission that 9/11 was an inside job:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

"The Noble Lie"

I believe that on the strength of the five YouTube links above an objective investigation would have more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment of Bush and Cheney on a charge of high treason, and to summon a grand jury that would indict many others on charges of high treason against Larry Silverstein and other apparent 9/11 collaborators. I believe that the American people, if presented with a single news story containing the five YouTube links above, would demand that the case of high treason be carried to its logical conclusion.

Congress, though, won't impeach the president. The mainstream media, for which I used to write, will not investigate and report the story. The military that was used as a tool to mass murder American citizens will not take action against traitors in uniform who knew exactly what they were doing on 9/11, or the many more uniformed dupes who thought they were conducting military exercises until the events of 9/11 occurred. To this day there have been no adverse actions -- which would require investigation and evaluation -- against any military person involved in what even official apologists call the greatest defense failure in American history. All of this shows that the fix is in, and that we are in a fix.

The high officials, media executives and military officers who are bound by law and ethics to serve the American people have become a textbook example of a grand conspiracy. To look at it from their point of view, they are historic actors who are beyond good and evil, who must stimulate the American people to a necessary geostrategic adventure by any means necessary. To them, the official account of the 9/11 "terror" attacks is what Plato once described as the "noble lie," a necessary falsehood told to a childlike public in order to direct it maturely. The simple fact is that 9/11 has justified an attempt to seize and control the ultimate geostrategic resource: oil. He who controls Middle East oil controls the world.

Top Three US Target Cities

Last year I published "Next 9/11, Summer 2007?" in response to the same kind of requests that have led me to publish this essay as a 2008 update. My 2007 three most likely cities for the next 9/11 were Houston, Chicago and Portland. This year the same three cities are still most endangered, in light of the fact that the US military has designated Texas, Indiana and Oregon as three of its four target states in the 2008 version of its Noble Resolve military exercises. Granted, Chicago is in Illinois, not Indiana, but Indiana is quite close, and has been used to stage forces for terror exercises conducted in Chicago in recent years.

It may come as a surprise to people not acquainted with military preparations that the same cities remain on the list even though analysts like me have publicized them widely. There are considerable difficulties in setting up the political, police, military and media players necessary to support a false flag attack. While many in the 911 truth movement believes that national military forces can simply hit any city at any time, it's not so easy -- thank God. Fortunately, this means that those of us who study false flag prospects and focus on most likely targets; regrettably, this means that target cities can't breathe easy just because they have detected, exposed and preempted a single false flag attempt.

Here is a brief target analysis of the top three cities:

Primary Target: Houston. Over the past four years military and police veterans like me have been alerting the public to government exercises aiming at the nuclear destruction of Houston petro-suburbs. Five times in those four years we were able to predict to within a day major petrochemical explosions in those petro-suburbs. The odds against this kind of accuracy are astronomical. As the center of Big Oil and the Bush Family, Houston remains the most endangered city in America. Any patriotic group, like mine, trying to alert its home city to the dangers of a false flag attack should read my recent article, "The 1/31 Nuke: Proof for Ron Paul" about the successful interdiction of a 2006 attempt against Texas City:
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/08/01/28/may.htm

Secondary Target: Chicago. While Houston is the most endangered city, the most endangered building -- the best candidate to be the next World Trade Center -- is the Sears Tower. Official sources have pronounced it just that ever since the original 9/11 attack, when they said it was on the Al Qaeda hit list. Larry Silverstein, who bought the Twin Towers two months before 9/11, led a group that purchased the Sears Tower on 3/11, 2004, the day of the Madrid bombings. Federal officials have been pointing to Chicago and its Sears Tower as Al Qaeda targets since the original 9/11 attacks, and have repeated the threat ever since. In May 2006,, the government scheduled secret 9/11-type exercises in Chicago, while Chicago Mayor Daley was docked conveniently away in Israel for his first visit there. I sent a widely read communiqué to Illinois Governor Blagojevich as part of a successful Internet attempt to shut down the pending false flag attack:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2...p_com.html

Tertiary Target: Portland. Portland, called "Little Beirut" by Bush cronies because of its enmity to Bush 41 and Bush 43, only made my top three list last summer, when it was designated as a target for a nuclear attack by successive exercises Noble Resolve and TOPOFF. The language in an official press release stated the case plainly enough: "Noble Resolve will coordinate with officials in Oregon to model a nuclear attack on Portland." In the course of researching Portland for a series of articles I wrote about the city and its exercises. I discovered that Stanford and Harvard had prepared a detailed nuclear fallout map for it, that national military commanders and state National Guard commanders were telling different stories about what the exercises were trying to accomplish, and that Portland's The Oregonian newspaper was doing everything it could to avoid investigating the frightening anomalies. I wasn't at all surprised that the last day of the exercises found the Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff in downtown Portland, which was largely closed down by an "unexpected" bomb threat. For another professional perspective on how great the danger was -- and may be again -- I refer the reader to the analysis of my colleague, Major William B. Fox (USMC):
http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/a...2006&z=186

Postscript

"Good morning. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison." -- George W. Bush, Feb. 13, 2008

I can't think of a more important question than the one of where the next 9/11 will be attempted. Common sense dictates to all of us who understand the truth about 9/11 that its perpetrators must strike again. Indeed, every directive, act and decision of our post-9/11 unitary executive, cowards Congress and Judas judiciary has increased the power of the federal government to wage the Global War and impose the Homeland State.

Why on earth would those already guilty of high treason, mass murder and war crimes fail to follow up on their earlier efforts? They understand quite well that the Global War is going badly and the Homeland State is becoming onerous, and that only a reapplication of false flag terror will force the American people to proceed with our post-9/11 national insanity.

Still, for every one person who republishes or constructively comments on this essay, there will be another who employs division, abuse and ridicule against me or anyone else who asserts the common sense point that false flaggers will continue to false flag, just as murderers will continue to murder and robbers will continue to rob. It's Newtonian in its simplicity: things continue to drift the way they are drifting until they are stopped.

We can only stop the deadly drift of America by understanding 9/11 and anticipating the next 9/11. Many of the vociferous voices impeding our understanding and anticipation are performing a vital service for treason. The federal government once used counterintelligence programs (COINTELPRO) against the Vietnam era antiwar and civil rights movement, and common sense would suggest that they are using it again in the post-9/11 era, this time against the antiwar and 911 truth movement. The most dangerous voices of all our those from false friends who have infiltrated us to confuse us until the traitors who carried out 9/11 can repeat their performance.

Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer. His political and military analyses have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine.

[James Lewis]

And here's some background on things that have been happening at Houston-area refineries the last few years. Notice the number of references to BP. Keep in mind also that the author, Captain Eric S. May, spent five years with military intelligence conducting military war games.

The Texas Triangle: Terror and Treason
By Captain Eric H. May - Military Correspondent

October 22, 2007

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." -- George W. Bush, Aug. 5, 2004

The Texas Triangle is formed by three cities. From Houston in the north it extends an hour's drive east to Beaumont, and a half an hour's drive south to Galveston. The Gulf of Mexico extends from Beaumont to Galveston, and forms the bottom of the triangle. Predominated by the petrochemicals industry, it is the most target-rich industrial district in America.

My first analysis of it as a terror target, Don't laugh at duct tape; it saves lives, was published by The Houston Chronicle on 2/23/03. Within half a year federal officials were teaching local law enforcement and first responders its conclusion, which was that Houston, the heart of the Texas Triangle, was the most likely place in the nation for the next 9/11. When I wrote the analysis, I had no doubts about the official 9/11 story, and was trying to reactivate my commission to go fight in the Middle East.

An Alarming Report and a Red Alert

"Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right." -- Congressman Peter DeFazio, 7/20/07

W. Leon Smith, publisher of the Lone Star Iconoclast, was alarmed when he called me at 10:30 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 17. He told me to read an e-mail he had just received from Texas City and forwarded to me in Houston. We were in the middle of a busy week covering TOPOFF, the Oct. 15-19 worldwide nuclear terror exercise. According to our insider source, we should have been paying less attention to the worldwide picture, and more attention to our own backyard of Texas. After I opened and read the e-mail, I became alarmed, too.

It contained a confidential British Petroleum memorandum, issued Oct. 16 and written by company security manager Glenn Starkey, and bore the ominous title "Live" security/terrorism exercise Thursday October 18. In it Starkey explained that on Oct. 4, two weeks earlier, the FBI, Homeland Security, US Coast Guard and various Texas police agencies had been running a command post terror exercise in Texas City. They were about to come back for a full-scale effort.

"This Thursday October 18, 2007, BP and other clients of the Port of Texas City will participate in a "live" security/terrorism exercise with federal and local agencies in the Port of Texas City," Starkey wrote. "FBI SWAT, Bomb Techs, Texas City Police Department SWAT, Galveston County Sheriff Dept. Marine Units, and DHS-USCG will be participating in this major event." He added that the media would only be told about the exercise just before it was to occur.

Mr. Smith and I talked it over, and agreed that the delay in announcing the exercises meant either that they had been suddenly scheduled, or that the government was keeping them secret. Both of these possibilities were cause for alarm, we agreed. We double checked our source, confirmed it, and by 11 p.m. had issued an urgent worldwide bulletin: RED ALERT TEXAS CITY: "Live" Drill 10/18/07. Before hanging up, we agreed on which lawyer we would use should either of us be arrested overnight.

A Pillar of Fire and a Fearful Pasadena

"The truth is, Bush just likes to blow things up in Iraq, in the United States and in Congress." -- Congressman Pete Stark, 10/18/07

I woke up early the next morning to discover that three hours after The Iconoclast issued its red alert it had been validated. A Dow Chemical pipeline had blown up at 2 a.m. in Port Arthur, a city in the Texas Triangle just outside Beaumont. Fire was shooting up 100 feet, area trees were igniting like matchsticks and toxic chemicals were spewing into the city air. Residents were sheltering in place, houses shut up and air conditioners shut off to keep themselves from being poisoned. People throughout surrounding Jefferson County could see a pillar of fire, but people in Port Arthur thought it was hell on earth.

Area police were unresponsive when I called them, offering no details when asked about ongoing exercises in Texas City and the explosion in Port Arthur. They referred me to a Homeland Security spokesperson who did not return my call. Thank God for the Internet, since that relentless medium quickly began to dig out details of what had happened. The best discovery was that Port Arthur -- only two days before -- had been conducting terror exercises like those in Texas City.

"And they blew it up this morning!" one of our Iconoclast intelligence sources wrote us before noon, outraged at the obvious false flag operation. "They have no shame, no efforts to hide their methods!"

In all likelihood the perpetrators of the Port Arthur explosion had set up the terror exercises in Port Arthur and Texas City, and perhaps in other petroleum cities in the Texas Triangle. Once committed to the plan they pretty much had to do something. In this case, it was something relatively minor. The Port Arthur explosion caused no fatalities, but it was industrial sabotage at the least. The guilt was substantial and shared, which meant that none of the plotters could afford to rat the others out. Since greed is always part of a false flag conspiracy, connected insiders could profit from the inevitable flux in the markets: oil reached $90 per barrel by the end of the day, a record high.

There was an even more harrowing event than the Port Arthur explosion still in store for the Texas Triangle, though. At 5 p.m. Texas Highway 225, the Pasadena Freeway, was closed because of a nuclear incident. Local hazardous materials teams and a national Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team were on the scene, along with a full entourage of various police agencies. Pasadena is notorious throughout the area as "Stinkadena" because of the noxious fumes spilling out of its petrochemical refineries, pipelines and tank farms.

Petrochemical incidents like the one in Port Arthur are occasional facts of life in our part of Texas, but nuclear incidents like the one in Pasadena are unheard-of rarities. By the end of the day official spokespersons and the mainstream media were assuring the Texas Triangle that the petrochemical and nuclear incidents were innocuous, and unrelated. To those of us who knew the story behind the story, though, there remained the damning facts: two sudden terror drills had coincided with two WMD-related events. Without the principled insider's report to The Iconoclast, followed by our red alert, who can say what might have occurred in the Texas Triangle?

The Texas Triangle: Terror and Treason

"I am concerned that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran." -- Congressman Ron Paul, 1/11/07

This wasn't the first time I have been part of an Internet effort to expose a false flag event in the Texas Triangle, it was the sixth. In five of the six cases our predictions were confirmed by explosions. Four of the explosions resulted in world record petroleum prices, and probably lavish rewards for the insiders who had invested in the markets based on advanced knowledge. All six of the events were in the Texas Triangle. We never issued an incorrect prediction: there were six predictions and six events.

A mathematician friend of mine recently calculated that if we assumed an average of four random explosions per year in the Texas Triangle, the odds against correctly guessing the day of any explosion to within one day would be 30 to one, while the odds against being correct six times in a row would be nearly a billion to one.

There are all sorts of minor coincidences in the six events that argue against their being merely coincidental. Two of the six occurred a day after the first two scheduled NASA launches since the Columbia disaster of 2003. The Johnson Space Center, Mission Control for NASA, is within the Texas Triangle. Three of the six events have been in Texas City, which was at the time split between the two most dissimilar members of Congress in recent memory, Ron Paul and Tom DeLay. The national media hyped the Al Qaeda fear of the American people before each of the six events, and local media have painstakingly stuck to the official story after each of them.

I believe now, as I believed in 2003, that Houston and its Texas Triangle remain the nation's most likely target for the next 9/11 attack. A great change has come over me since 2003, though: I no longer believe that we will be attacked by Al Qaeda; rather, I believe that we will be attacked by Al CIA-duh.

My claims are documented, and I invite investigation. In fact, I have constantly appealed to my former colleagues in the media, the military and the police to look into my allegations. Most of them dismiss the very possibility that there could be treasonous terrorism by the Bush administration. Some admit the possibility though, and a few even accept the reality of deliberately staged false flag attacks, but they are frightened of being witnesses to or whistleblowers against so great a criminal activity. As a consequence of my importunity, I can boast of having been threatened by everyone from the FBI to the DIA, having been ignored by both the House of Representatives and the Senate and having been ridiculed by the national and the local media. None of this, however, changes the billion-to-one odds against making six correct predictions out of six attempts.

An Earnest Epilogue and an Early Epitaph

"If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." -- George W. Bush, 12/18/00

Since the beginning of my efforts to defend the Texas Triangle, I have been asked repeatedly how it could be true that the Bush administration was attempting to sabotage southeast Texas and I was still alive when I had interfered. I have an answer of sorts to that question now. Soon after the third of my six Texas Triangle missions, I began to experience general body fatigue, followed by muscle spasms, followed by muscular atrophy. Within a year I was diagnosed with ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease, a fatal neuromuscular disorder. The odds against contracting ALS in any given year are 35,000 to one.

I believe two things utterly: I have done my duty, and I have been paid in full for doing it. Now bound to a wheelchair, I can no longer stand up, but I can still stand for something: my oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

As an epilogue to my Texas Triangle analysis, I leave a short appendix of interviews and articles below, for the most part broadcast and published a few days before or after the events they address. I believe that the interested reader will find more than enough material here to reach an informed opinion of my efforts.

10/18/07 Port Arthur, Dow Chemical pipeline explodes:

It Pays to Monitor Terror Exercises
Theresa Mitchell, Presswatch, KBOO, Portland

7/2/06 Baytown, Exxon Mobil refinery explodes:

Countdown to Terror? NASA Discovery and 9112B
Captain May w/ Lt. Lenny Bloom, Toronto, Canada

1/31/06 Texas City, British Petroleum false flag exposed:

Terror Attack on Texas City -- Texas City Saved Again!
Captain May w/ Lt. Lenny Bloom, Toronto, Canada

1/1/06 Captain May shows first signs of ALS:

Framing A Photo Of Lou Gehrig's Disease
Captain May, Lone Star Iconoclast

7/28/05 Texas City, British Petroleum refinery explodes:

Mission 911-2B -- Texas City Saved!
Captain May w/ Lt. Lenny Bloom, Toronto, Canada

9/26/04 New Caney pipeline explodes:

Embedded Code Broken? Next 911 on September 27?
Captain May, Rense.com

3/30/04 Texas City, British Petroleum refinery explodes:

Thwarting Nuclear Terror in Texas: Investigation
Major William B. Fox, Lone Star Iconoclast

2/23/03 Houston-area terror threat analyzed:

Don't laugh at duct tape; it saves lives
Eric H. May, Houston Chronicle



Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer. His political and military analyses have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine. He is the leader of the Portland Nuclear Inquest, a group of concerned citizens monitoring and discussing the TOPOFF / Vigilant Shield terror exercises. Interested readers can join here. Anyone interested in learning more about the upcoming Portland area nuclear exercises should refer to his interview with Theresa Mitchell of KBOO radio.