Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
NATO transforming into a global invasion and occupation force
#1
[TABLE="width: 798"]
[TR]
[TD]September 29-30, 2011 -- NATO transforming into a global invasion and occupation force

After engaging in out-of-area invasions and occupations of Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and Libya, the "North Atlantic" Treaty Organization, NATO, has transformed itself from a Cold War defensive alliance into a global offensive axis of nations that acts with or without United Nations authorization.

NATO, under its own umbrella or the aegis of the UN or European Union, has established de facto neo-colonial governments in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, South Sudan, and Libya. Political advisers from NATO nations act as virtual colonial administrators in all these nations, exercising veto authority over the governments installed by Western military might. NATO's template for invasion and occupation is now being honed for north Sudan and Syria.

The first nation to come under NATO occupation was Bosnia-Herzegovina, created from the ashes of the former Yugoslavia. After NATO's "Stabilization Force" (SFOR) was dissolved, the European Force (EUFOR) was created. EUFOR's "OPERATION ALTHEA" authorizes 1600 troops from mostly NATO nations, including France, Italy, Turkey, and Germany, to occupy Bosnia-Herzegovina. EUFOR's main base is at Camp Butmir, a former Yugoslav air base outside of Sarajevo.
Additional troops can be deployed to Bosnia-Herzegovina from NATO's Kosovo Force (KFOR) in neighboring Kosovo, carved by NATO out of Serbia.

EUFOR is also supplemented by a European Police Mission (EUPM), comprising police forces from mostly NATO nations. The European Union Special Reprsentative (EUSR) acts as a political viceroy with effective control over the government in Sarajevo. This control has been apparent in majority Muslim Bosnia-Herzegovina's waffling on how it will vote in the UN Security Council on Palestine's membership application.

NATO exercises political and military control over Kosovo through NATO's KFOR, which is based at Camp Film City in Pristina, the capital of Kosovo, a nation which remains unrecognized by UN Security permanent members Russia and China. While most NATO nations are opposed to UN membership for Palestine, they wholeheartedly support UN membership for Kosovo, a nation governed by remnants of the Kosovo Liberation Army, once recognized as a terrorist group by the United States and which has been accused of running a number of criminal enterprises, including human organ, narcotics, cigarette, nuclear material, weapons, and stolen automobile smuggling.

KFOR mainly comprises troops from NATO countries Germany, France, the United States, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, Romania, and Turkey. Under NATO KFOR command are troops from Ukraine, Austria, Switzerland, Sweden, Morocco, Armenia, Finland, and Ireland. There is little doubt that NATO's integration of non-NATO troops in theaters like Kosovo, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Libya is an attempt to integrate through the back door the armed forces of neutral and non-European nations, yet another indication of NATO's global expansion. NATO is on a fast track to becoming a worldwide military force for a de facto one-world, largely unelected, government.

KFOR's commander reports to the Commander of Joint Force Command in Naples, Italy. KFOR's political adviser exercises de facto veto authority over the "independent" government of Kosovo.

Currently, KFOR troops are engaged in asserting Kosovo control over majority Serbian communes in northern Kosovo and the troops have used "non-lethal" force, including rubber bullets, on Serbs who want to be integrated with Serbia. KFOR troops have torn
down barricades erected by Serbs town of Mitrovica that divide the Serbian northern half of the town from the Albanian southern half. NATO troops have injured a number of Serbs who have tried to protect the barriers, resulting in sharp rebukes from Serbia and Russia. Serbs in Kosovo feel they will be sacrificed to Kosovo by a Serbian government more intent on gaining membership in the EU and, eventually, NATO.

In Afghanistan, NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) exercises political and military control over the "independent" government of President Hamid Karzai. ISAF's commander is General John Allen of the U.S. Army. NATO provides most of ISAF's troop contingent with the largest military contingents from the United States, Turkey, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Denmark, and Poland. NATO has integrated into ISAF, troops from the non-NATO countries of Georgia, Australia, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Finland, Sweden, Jordan, Malaysia, Mongolia, Montenegro, New Zealand, South Korea, Macedonia, Tonga, Ukraine, and the United Arab Emirates. ISAF forces have been active in overt and covert operations in neighboring Pakistan, which is looming more and more on NATO's target list as a future nation that will see a NATO invasion and occupation, with the major goal of securing and removing Pakistan's nuclear weapons. ISAF is coordinating its anti-Pakistan activities with special forces and intelligence units from India and Israel. Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral Mike Mullen recently accused Pakistan of aiding the Haqqani network in Afghanistan in carrying out of terrorist attacks on NATO targets,, including the US embassy in Kabul.

[Image: natocosmic.JPG] [Image: natologo.gif]

NATO's symbol points in all directions. Where will NATO draw its boundaries? What are its ultimate TOP SECRET COSMIC plans?


NATO political advisers, including the chief ISAF political adviser, exercise de facto veto authority over Karzai's government. However, ultimate political authority over the Kabul government is maintained by the U.S. State Department's special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Marc Grossman. Grossman replaced the late Richard Holbrooke, one of the chief architects of NATO's war against Yugoslavia and the nation's ultimate dissolution.

Although NATO's presence in Iraq has diminished with the withdrawal of a number of troops from NATO nations, NATO's presence continues under the aegis of the NATO Training Mission-Iraq (NTM-I), established in 2004 as the result of a "request" from the interim government of Iraq and under the alleged authority of UN Security Council 1546, which authorized the creation of the interim Iraqi government. NTM-I's operations are politically directed by the North Atlantic Council, NATO's top political authority. The U.S. ambassador to Iraq, housed in America's largest embassy, continues to play a major political role in Iraq. NTM-I troops, mainly from the United States and Italy, will continue their presence in Iraq after the planned withdrawal of U.S., playing a major role in border security and Iraqi intelligence activities. Obama administration officials have signaled a willingness to extend the U.S. troop presence after the planned withdrawal of combat troops on December 31 of this year. NTM-I units will continue to be deployed at Iraqi bases, including at Camp Dublin at Baghdad International Airport, the Ar-Rustamiyah base southeast of Baghdad, Taji airbase north of Baghdad, and within the Green Zone in Baghdad.

NATO, through the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), maintains de facto control over the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) of Somalia via the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM), which consists mostly of troops from Uganda and Burundi. In addition, the TFG is supported by Ethiopian military forces and CIA operatives. The CIA operates from a secret base at Mogadishu's Aden Adde International Airport. CIA officers direct the activities of AMISOM's Ugandan and Burundian forces in Somalia and conduct drone attacks against suspected Islamist guerrillas in the country. The CIA base in Mogadishu also coordinates drone attacks throughout the Horn of Africa and Yemen with other CIA drone facilities in Djibouti, Seychelles, and Oman. The delegation representing the TFG was the only non-white/European delegation to walk out of the UN General Assembly during the recent speech of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

In Libya, NATO has established a permanent link with the Libyan National Transition Council with plans to name a political adviser who will "advise" the Libyan government in a carbon copy of NATO's political advisory roles in Kosovo and Afghanistan. The NATO political adviser, a post pushed by the CIA-backed American Libyan Council, will coordinate the introduction of NATO "peacekeeping" forces, expected to be drawn from Turkey and those Arab nations that are taking part in NATO's military operations in Libya -- Qatar and the United Arab Emirates -- and nations participating in NATO operations in other countries, including Morocco and Jordan. NATO's outreach to Arab monarchies in the Gulf, Jordan, and Morocco to become de facto "associate members" of NATO are conducted through the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative. NATO's outreach to Jordan and Morocco, as well as Egypt, Israel, Algeria, Mauritania, Tunisia, and now, Libya, is conducted through the Mediterranean Dialogue.

NATO has extended its military mission in Libya, "OPERATION UNIFIED PROTECTOR," citing UN Security Council Resolution 2009, an authorization disputed by Russia and members of the African Union that have resisted being assimilated into the AFRICOM structure, most notably, South Africa.

The Libyan National Transition Council has already agreed to a permanent NATO military presence in Libya, including the establishment of a NATO airbase at Kufra, near the border with northern Sudan. The government in Khartoum will be the next target for NATO and AFRICOM in Africa, according to intelligence sources in Africa. The goal for NATO is to deny China continued access to Sudanese oil and promote the secession of Darfur, which will, like Kosovo and South Sudan, will become a vassal state of NATO, with AFRICOM and NATO calling the shots, with diplomatic support from pro-West African Union nations like Ethiopia, Uganda, and Rwanda, used as political cover.

NATO plans also foresee NATO-directed regimes soon coming to power in Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, Iran in the near future, with North Korea, Russia, and China in a more distant crystal ball.



http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20110929_1



[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kharkov Arsenal Explosion- a pre-emptive strike against a NATO dirty bomb? Paul Rigby 0 2,747 24-03-2017, 09:38 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  The Global Terror Tour - Enter The Magic Tent - Free Admission Peter Lemkin 0 3,398 22-11-2016, 02:45 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Guiding Obama into Global Make Believe David Guyatt 0 3,439 16-03-2015, 01:09 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  When is a NATO not a N.A.T.O - and other secrets of NATO Peter Lemkin 0 2,268 08-05-2014, 08:37 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The obscene lifestyles of the new global super rich Tracy Riddle 1 3,436 26-01-2014, 02:12 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  War with China? The Dangers of a Global Conflagration Paul Rigby 1 2,739 30-04-2010, 02:24 AM
Last Post: Mark Stapleton

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)