Posts: 17,304
Threads: 3,464
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there.
Thou shalt not take the Evica-Drago Model lightly.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Off-Topic: Clint Hill was on MSNBC tonight on Chris Matthews talking about the White House fence jumper. He said the jumper was not like some of the bigger conspiracies that could be plotted against the president. Gee, I wonder what he was thinking about?
Posts: 17,304
Threads: 3,464
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there.
Thou shalt not take the Evica-Drago Model lightly.
Yes, so it seems apparently..... It's a very fine model and always worth trying it out for results and GME a fine man and excellent researcher as is Charles in many ways but love a duck there is more in the world than one model and one dimension one colour etc. Groupthink and mental straightjackets are not good for enlightened research out comes.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Posts: 901
Threads: 61
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there.
Thou shalt not take the Evica-Drago Model lightly.
Do you have any substantive criticisms of the model?
I am not interested in whatever personal enmity may exist between yourself and Charles Drago but I am curious to know how you would set about delineating the various levels/dimensions of the plot without recourse to a model that is at least similarto the aforementioned.
Just wondering.
“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.â€
― Leo Tolstoy,
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
R.K. Locke Wrote:Bob Prudhomme Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Much ado about nothing. Can't see the point of a major blood letting over a semantic point that is already established and accepted. I see Bob P has been erased from the history books there.
Thou shalt not take the Evica-Drago Model lightly.
Do you have any substantive criticisms of the model?
I am not interested in whatever personal enmity may exist between yourself and Charles Drago but I am curious to know how you would set about delineating the various levels/dimensions of the plot without recourse to a model that is at least similarto the aforementioned.
Just wondering.
I have found the worst way of researching the JFK assassination is to become a devotee of someone else's model. I research the evidence and draw my own conclusions.
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 2,690
Threads: 253
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2013
"It's only a model," Terry Gilliam says in Monty Python & the Holy Grail as they stand gazing in rapture at Camelot. :
:
Posts: 875
Threads: 45
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2011
Tracy Riddle Wrote:"It's only a model," Terry Gilliam says in Monty Python & the Holy Grail as they stand gazing in rapture at Camelot. ::
"Shhh...."
Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.
Warren Commission testimony of Secret Service Agent Clinton J. Hill, 1964
Posts: 254
Threads: 5
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
The problem isn't with the model IMO. it is very similar to Fletcher Prouty's "model" if you will. The problem is the insistence that anything discussed that isn't directly related to the GME/CD cannon is playing Clue like parlor games wasting valuable message board space. It is a tool for thinking about the case, not a religion. And not a springboard for Ian Fleming like spy fantasizing. IMO if you want a spy novelist to characterize this operation, it is more likely Le Carre.
Posts: 5,374
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
I think Charles bashes people with it to make up for his own personal lack of technical ability to argue abstract evidence. That said, I still respect both Charles's wit and his model.
I also think Charles makes the mistake of missing CIA's majority involvement in the conspiracy - Evica model not withstanding.
