On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Scott Kaiser]

D

[Scott Kaiser]

D

[Scott Kaiser]

D

[Scott Kaiser]

D

[Mark A. O'Blazney]

D

Yes. And to 'Bring it All Back Home", there is the famous debate on youtube entitled 'The Lone Gunman Podcast Ep. 85 Live'…………. enjoy talking to the hand !!!

[Scott Kaiser]

Since I am no longer or able to edit or delete information I put up on my father's thread, I shall no longer post about my father or those who worked with him, all information has now been turned over to the publisher for wide exposure. I will however, ask how Mr. Weitzman says in his recorded interview, "In my sorrow"... then tells a pretty wild story about how he made a mistake in the identity of the rifle's, unless, he was coerced into [later] changing his statement for some apparent reason, and that he had to do, this is the reason for the interview, in saying, I made a mistake in identifying the rifle's, someone told him he had to do the interview, and two, why did he never retract his affidavit?

I can't wait to expose it all... My fingers are itching, lmao!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4l9Sczs9aI

[Scott Kaiser]

Just one question, how does someone who says he saw the gun at a glance and thought it was a Mauser, therefore, he felt the need to correct himself in an interview when at a glance, he was able to correctly identify a 7.65 "bolt action" with a 4/18 scope, and a thick leather brownish-black sling on it. You mean to tell me that without observing the rifle up close and personal until Captain Fritz took control of the gun he didn't know what it was? And, because he was among the first to discover the gun, he was told by someone he only observed the gun at a glance? Therefore, he was told he needed to change his story because that's what the FBI lab told him, it was a Carcano, and probably repeated, "it was a Carcano" over and over so many times that he began to think he may had made a mistake?... I smell bullshit!

I'll go with his first ID of the rifle...

[Scott Kaiser]

"I didn't see anybody behind the fence, but there may have been somebody watching the parade from behind the fence." So, which is it? I mean, how did his testimony along with Wietzman's get lost? I mean, they both swear they encountered Secret Service from behind the fence, and now their stories are edited? I love how he's quoting how many of the conspiracy theories books belong on the fiction shelf. Oh God......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLxkIKRIPb4

[Scott Kaiser]

Just for topic, maybe, for me to understand people some more? I'm always learning. I have a question I'd like to ask, and, anyone of course is invited to answer. My question is, what if the person who really assassinated Kennedy or a relative of his appeared on this forum, of course with all the pretty wild stories out there now, it would be difficult to accept someone, but, just hypothetically speaking, what if a real assassin, or the relative of the assassin visited this board, what would you ask or say to that person?

Certainly, I wouldn't suspect anyone of being tongue tied with all the constant posts and reviews, heck, some even know what Oswald did and where he was nearly every minute of that day, November 22, 1963.

My first question would be, what were you or your dad thinking or hoping to get accomplished by killing Kennedy, what was on your mind, what did you want to achieve? Fame? Well, it certainly couldn't be that sense I've never heard about you till now, so what was it? Just pure hatred for the man? I doubt that, there's got to be some family members you can't stand, not enough to kill them, so what was it?

Everyone has a motive when it comes to killing someone, there's always a motive.

[Scott Kaiser]

My second question would be, were you ever married, and if so, why would you leave your pregnant wife behind? And lastly, how do you know "they knew that the Monroe Doctrine made by President Monroe, which was made to protect the Americans, North, South and central from infiltration from other government foreign and abroad was not Kennedy."