05-07-2015, 08:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-07-2015, 08:59 PM by Jim DiEugenio.)
I just glanced over at the fruitcake Dale Myers' site.
This is the guy who at one time, not so long ago, was a fierce critic of the Warren Commission. And John Kelin interviewed him at that time. And its at the CTKA site.
Realizing there was no upside in return for spending all that time knocking the official story, he circled around 180 degress around the time of the Oliver Stone film.
Then, with help from his pal Gus Russo, he appeared on national television in 2003 to pronounce one of the greatest lies ever broadcast. He called the fulcrum of the Warren Report, the Single Bullet Fact.
HA HA HA LOL ROTF
He actually kept a straight face while saying it. That's how bad he wanted to get paid.
Well, on his blog spot he noticed Vince's passing. He says he assisted Vince with Reclaiming History. (He was actually supposed to get a co-writer credit after Fred Haines, Vince's original partner, got sick.)
But Delusionary Dale just cannot help himself. He actually calls RH, easily the best book in the assassination field.
:
:::cuckoo::
I like the throwaway use of the modifier "easily". RH is nothing but a rerun of just about every discredited piece of evidence that the WC and HSCA used to prop up the ludicrous idea that Oswald was the lone assassin. Neither Vince, nor Myers, nor Haines honestly confronted any of the best evidence against the official story. Nor did they even acknowledge the newer evidence that completely vitiates it: Jeremy Gunn's interview of John Stringer, where he denounces the photos of the brain at NARA; John Armstrong's work on CE 139 showing that its the wrong rifle; and John Hunt and Robert Harris' work, which together destroys the efficacy of CE 399 and shows a separate bullet went into, and dropped out of, Connally. In other words: wrong brain, wrong rifle, wrong bullet. Some case huh?
To call such a bloated, selective rehash easily the best book on the case, shows just how out there in the stratosphere Myers is right now. He made his money off of Frontline, and Peter Jennings, and he is now sticking to it.
We now know that the WC was a knowing fraud. That the majority of the commissioners understood that. And so did the staffers. To uphold such a fraud renders one's work to the level of an anthropological curiosity, like looking at and playing with a rare animal in a zoo.
This is the guy who at one time, not so long ago, was a fierce critic of the Warren Commission. And John Kelin interviewed him at that time. And its at the CTKA site.
Realizing there was no upside in return for spending all that time knocking the official story, he circled around 180 degress around the time of the Oliver Stone film.
Then, with help from his pal Gus Russo, he appeared on national television in 2003 to pronounce one of the greatest lies ever broadcast. He called the fulcrum of the Warren Report, the Single Bullet Fact.
HA HA HA LOL ROTF
He actually kept a straight face while saying it. That's how bad he wanted to get paid.
Well, on his blog spot he noticed Vince's passing. He says he assisted Vince with Reclaiming History. (He was actually supposed to get a co-writer credit after Fred Haines, Vince's original partner, got sick.)
But Delusionary Dale just cannot help himself. He actually calls RH, easily the best book in the assassination field.
:
:::cuckoo::I like the throwaway use of the modifier "easily". RH is nothing but a rerun of just about every discredited piece of evidence that the WC and HSCA used to prop up the ludicrous idea that Oswald was the lone assassin. Neither Vince, nor Myers, nor Haines honestly confronted any of the best evidence against the official story. Nor did they even acknowledge the newer evidence that completely vitiates it: Jeremy Gunn's interview of John Stringer, where he denounces the photos of the brain at NARA; John Armstrong's work on CE 139 showing that its the wrong rifle; and John Hunt and Robert Harris' work, which together destroys the efficacy of CE 399 and shows a separate bullet went into, and dropped out of, Connally. In other words: wrong brain, wrong rifle, wrong bullet. Some case huh?
To call such a bloated, selective rehash easily the best book on the case, shows just how out there in the stratosphere Myers is right now. He made his money off of Frontline, and Peter Jennings, and he is now sticking to it.
We now know that the WC was a knowing fraud. That the majority of the commissioners understood that. And so did the staffers. To uphold such a fraud renders one's work to the level of an anthropological curiosity, like looking at and playing with a rare animal in a zoo.