07-07-2015, 12:22 AM
Again, working backwards:
The official story says that Oswald picked up the rifle at his PO box on an unknown date.
Except, this would have been highly improbable.
Why?
Because the rifle was not ordered in Oswald's name. The official story has the rifle ordered under the alias Hidell.
This created an enormous problem for the WC.
See, there was a postal regulation that said mail could not be delivered to a PO box unless the mail matched the box holder's name.
Therefore, under this regulation, the rifle should have been returned to Klein's marked "addessee unknown".
How does the WR dodge this one? Through lies and alteration of evidence.
Harry Holmes, an FBI informant, was called by the WC to say the regulation only applied to mail and not merchandise. The problem was he showed up with no regulation book or regulation citation in his hands to prove this was so. (Reclaiming Parkland, p. 61) If it was so, would he not have cited such a source, and would not the Commission have brought in like say the Postmaster General to testify to this exception? But the FBI , who coordinated the witness agendas and supplied background info on them, knew they could trust Holmes. And boy did Harry lie his head off for them.
He also said that Oswald probably allowed for someone else to pick up mail for him. That would have been marked down in Part 3 of the box application form. The only problem with Harry saying that was this: there was no part 3 available. So Harry told another lie. He said that that it was SOP to dispose of those applications once the box expired.
How bad was the WC? This bad. Young Stewart Galanor wrote a letter to the post office HQ in Washington in 1966. A man named Ralph Rea wrote back and said that in all post office branches in 1963 no one should get mail not addressed to him; and that the mail application in all parts should be retained for two years after the box was closed. Further, that delivery receipts for firearms and statements by shippers of firearms should be held for four years. (See Galanor, Cover Up, Documents 37-38)
Just how bad of a perjurer was Holmes? And just how bad was the FBI?
Regarding the latter, the FBI knew that the box application did not include permission for anyone else to get mail from Oswald's box in Dallas. (Reclaiming Parkland,p. 61) Concerning the former, after his death, Holmes' family contacted JFK Lancer Group. They apologized for what he did and tried to chalk it up to the pressures of the Cold War. (ibid)
The official story says that Oswald picked up the rifle at his PO box on an unknown date.
Except, this would have been highly improbable.
Why?
Because the rifle was not ordered in Oswald's name. The official story has the rifle ordered under the alias Hidell.
This created an enormous problem for the WC.
See, there was a postal regulation that said mail could not be delivered to a PO box unless the mail matched the box holder's name.
Therefore, under this regulation, the rifle should have been returned to Klein's marked "addessee unknown".
How does the WR dodge this one? Through lies and alteration of evidence.
Harry Holmes, an FBI informant, was called by the WC to say the regulation only applied to mail and not merchandise. The problem was he showed up with no regulation book or regulation citation in his hands to prove this was so. (Reclaiming Parkland, p. 61) If it was so, would he not have cited such a source, and would not the Commission have brought in like say the Postmaster General to testify to this exception? But the FBI , who coordinated the witness agendas and supplied background info on them, knew they could trust Holmes. And boy did Harry lie his head off for them.
He also said that Oswald probably allowed for someone else to pick up mail for him. That would have been marked down in Part 3 of the box application form. The only problem with Harry saying that was this: there was no part 3 available. So Harry told another lie. He said that that it was SOP to dispose of those applications once the box expired.
How bad was the WC? This bad. Young Stewart Galanor wrote a letter to the post office HQ in Washington in 1966. A man named Ralph Rea wrote back and said that in all post office branches in 1963 no one should get mail not addressed to him; and that the mail application in all parts should be retained for two years after the box was closed. Further, that delivery receipts for firearms and statements by shippers of firearms should be held for four years. (See Galanor, Cover Up, Documents 37-38)
Just how bad of a perjurer was Holmes? And just how bad was the FBI?
Regarding the latter, the FBI knew that the box application did not include permission for anyone else to get mail from Oswald's box in Dallas. (Reclaiming Parkland,p. 61) Concerning the former, after his death, Holmes' family contacted JFK Lancer Group. They apologized for what he did and tried to chalk it up to the pressures of the Cold War. (ibid)