11-09-2015, 04:35 PM
There are obviously some people who are desperate to place Oswald on the front steps as Prayer Man. These people forget to mention that Carolyn Arnold saw Oswald around 12:24 as she told Earl Golz:
Earl Golz Interviews Carolyn Arnold
In an interview with the journalist Earl Golz in 1978, Carolyn Arnold claimed that "she saw Oswald in the 2ndfloor lunchroom as she was on her way out of the depository to watch the presidential motorcade …. She left the building at 12:25pm." (Earl Golz, Was Oswald in Window?,' Dallas Morning News, 26 November 1978, p.13A; available as PDF).
Golz quotes her as saying that Oswald "was sitting there … in one of the booth seats on the righthand side of the room as you go in. He was alone as usual and appeared to be having lunch. I did not speak to him but I recognized him clearly." She explicitly denied that her sighting of Oswald took place near the front doors: "Why would I be looking back inside the building? That doesn't make any sense to me."
The site is grabbing the text font from my insert. Anyway, what Ms Arnold's statement, that these Oswald as Prayer Man proponents are ignoring, shows is that Oswald was eating lunch in the 2nd floor lunch room. This means Fritz's notes can be interpreted as saying Oswald ate lunch in the 2nd floor lunch room, then went down to the 1st floor employee room, and then went 'out' of the building where he saw Shelly out front on the steps.
What Oswald as Prayer Man proponents are ignoring is Carolyn Arnold reasonably saw Oswald at 12:24. Since Baker claimed he saw Oswald at 12:31:30 it makes it very likely Oswald was sitting there, where he was comfortably settled in for lunch, from 12:24 to 12:31:30.
If you look at detective science, in a very remote area where there was only one witness we have a very highly defined witnessing with rational evidence behind it. What Oswald as Prayer Man proponents are asking you to believe is that Oswald was standing in the Times Square of the assassination with dozens of witnesses and not one single person stepped up and identified him, even though detective science would show that his exposure rate was exponentially higher on the front steps. Science prevails here and the simple fact holds that Oswald was identified and witnessed where he was in the lunch room and was not identified where he wasn't, on the front steps.
.
Earl Golz Interviews Carolyn Arnold
In an interview with the journalist Earl Golz in 1978, Carolyn Arnold claimed that "she saw Oswald in the 2ndfloor lunchroom as she was on her way out of the depository to watch the presidential motorcade …. She left the building at 12:25pm." (Earl Golz, Was Oswald in Window?,' Dallas Morning News, 26 November 1978, p.13A; available as PDF).
Golz quotes her as saying that Oswald "was sitting there … in one of the booth seats on the righthand side of the room as you go in. He was alone as usual and appeared to be having lunch. I did not speak to him but I recognized him clearly." She explicitly denied that her sighting of Oswald took place near the front doors: "Why would I be looking back inside the building? That doesn't make any sense to me."
The site is grabbing the text font from my insert. Anyway, what Ms Arnold's statement, that these Oswald as Prayer Man proponents are ignoring, shows is that Oswald was eating lunch in the 2nd floor lunch room. This means Fritz's notes can be interpreted as saying Oswald ate lunch in the 2nd floor lunch room, then went down to the 1st floor employee room, and then went 'out' of the building where he saw Shelly out front on the steps.
What Oswald as Prayer Man proponents are ignoring is Carolyn Arnold reasonably saw Oswald at 12:24. Since Baker claimed he saw Oswald at 12:31:30 it makes it very likely Oswald was sitting there, where he was comfortably settled in for lunch, from 12:24 to 12:31:30.
If you look at detective science, in a very remote area where there was only one witness we have a very highly defined witnessing with rational evidence behind it. What Oswald as Prayer Man proponents are asking you to believe is that Oswald was standing in the Times Square of the assassination with dozens of witnesses and not one single person stepped up and identified him, even though detective science would show that his exposure rate was exponentially higher on the front steps. Science prevails here and the simple fact holds that Oswald was identified and witnessed where he was in the lunch room and was not identified where he wasn't, on the front steps.
.