05-09-2009, 02:35 PM
Oh, yes, Bernice, I am generally familiar with all of that... I wasn't trying to defend Teddy, and I certainly wasn't advancing the WC conclusions or anything close to them. I share Myra's sentiments, though perhaps at a kinder level, and I'm simply trying to explore the reasons for Teddy's statements given his awareness [he had to be aware, no?] of the voluminous research that has been done since December '63, and their conclusions as expressed by so many here and elsewhere.
I'm not, at this late hour and certainly not in this forum -- nor in the past or in any other forum --, trying to say that Oswald acted alone and that we should put the matter behind us. Quite the opposite, despite even what, for reasons that are obscure, the recently-deceased majordomo of the family said.
I agree with the thoughts recently expressed by Charles Drago.
As the protagonist in the movie Ronin said, "If there is any doubt, there can be no doubt." I'm a big fan of visceral intuition as a learning agent.
The attempts at cover-up alone tell the story.
If you look at the matter as if it were a negative of a photograph and turn it inside out and reverse the imagery, voila!.
I'm not, at this late hour and certainly not in this forum -- nor in the past or in any other forum --, trying to say that Oswald acted alone and that we should put the matter behind us. Quite the opposite, despite even what, for reasons that are obscure, the recently-deceased majordomo of the family said.
I agree with the thoughts recently expressed by Charles Drago.
As the protagonist in the movie Ronin said, "If there is any doubt, there can be no doubt." I'm a big fan of visceral intuition as a learning agent.
The attempts at cover-up alone tell the story.
If you look at the matter as if it were a negative of a photograph and turn it inside out and reverse the imagery, voila!.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"