30-09-2015, 11:08 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:David Healy Wrote:you gotta be kidding me? The frame image is crap, PERIOD! Lets see a histogram of the original frame. Then how many generations from the in-camera original frame is the frame you are currently studying? Tell us how long the in-camera original frame PM/PW arm is in pixels. Geez, and yet, within this degraded image you see clarity, a notch in the forearm at most 2-3 pixels in width...
Lets see, internet/forum-board imagery jpeg/gif regardless of image size, is 72dpi), then there's the compression issues and artifacts... We'll start there, the dimension of the image you're currently reviewing? And how many generations from the original frame? Feel free to have Dunc give you a hand (if he's not to busy starting another forum...
...
No, I disagree. Actually the photo Duncan presented was adequate enough that Drew actually caught some very fine features that I missed.
...
let me see, you can't confirm image quality, nor the generation of image re what you are looking at. AND your conclusion is based on AN unknown standard (determined by you, a quote "non photo expert), yet, it's "adequate" to form conclusions as to what is and what isn't included in the image? Sound about right, "Albert"?