01-10-2015, 06:18 PM
I have compared the 6 or so bright pixels that I circled in the enhanced and digitized Couch image (that seem to correspond in terms of location to the eyeglasses of the lady in the unenhanced and digitized image) with the pixels in the unenhanced and digitized shot of PM. There are no bright pixels, not even 1, in the unenhanced and digitized PM shot from Couch (which I posted) that correspond to the location of the bright pixels in the enhanced version.
There are a few reasons why this might be so: 1. The bright pixels could be an artifact of the enhancement process, 2. The enhanced picture began with a higher resolution digitization of the Couch original film PM shot and therefore might contain details that the normal digitized picture of the Couch film doesn't show, or 3. The bright pixels could have been added in later, manually. I discount possibility 3, because I am the one who observed the bright pixels, I didn't do the enhancement, and like Albert says, I have no agenda.
I have no opinion about possibilities 1 or 2. I suggest, that if further investigation of the issue is warranted, that Albert (or Duncan) post the original image (prior to the enhancement) that was used to make the enhancement.
There are a few reasons why this might be so: 1. The bright pixels could be an artifact of the enhancement process, 2. The enhanced picture began with a higher resolution digitization of the Couch original film PM shot and therefore might contain details that the normal digitized picture of the Couch film doesn't show, or 3. The bright pixels could have been added in later, manually. I discount possibility 3, because I am the one who observed the bright pixels, I didn't do the enhancement, and like Albert says, I have no agenda.
I have no opinion about possibilities 1 or 2. I suggest, that if further investigation of the issue is warranted, that Albert (or Duncan) post the original image (prior to the enhancement) that was used to make the enhancement.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."