07-10-2015, 04:34 PM
What gets to me about Jim and Tom is they ignore serious evidence in order to take down Janney by his flaws. But that's more like defense lawyering than credible Deep Political analysis.
The fact the broken down car was never traced and its documentation vaporized is a key clue that it was a set-up device used to bring an African American Military Police witness to the murder scene. Intel used this black witness to bolster their set-up of a black man. All very deviously designed to cement Crump's guilt.
The timing had to be seriously coordinated like the timing in Dealey Plaza. Wiggins had to be at the broken down car just slightly ahead of Mary being shot because Mary was the uncontrollable entity in the timing. The scene was a perfect CIA set-up location because the canal provided an uncrossable moat that protected the murder theater stage on the tow path. This was a well thought-out plan with a Pentagon spook brought in to assure military precision in the timing, events, and witnessing.
Wiggins said he had a strange sense that he was set-up to witness what his attention had been drawn to. The problem with using military patsies like Wiggins is they bring their combat senses with them and know when something isn't right.
So when you consider the broken down car and its import you realize Jim and Tom's attempt to discredit Janney by his weaknesses doesn't overcome critical evidence like this that broadcasts an Intel job. And that's why they omit it in their book-read criticisms. I think mainstream analysis of the events of the 1963 coup requires vigorous academic scrutiny and rigor. Jim does that to a fault, however I think sometimes these people get caught in a constant battle for integrity and don't know when to turn it off or when to not apply it to certain individuals where attacking less than water-tight research might come at the cost of denying real events.
The fact the broken down car was never traced and its documentation vaporized is a key clue that it was a set-up device used to bring an African American Military Police witness to the murder scene. Intel used this black witness to bolster their set-up of a black man. All very deviously designed to cement Crump's guilt.
The timing had to be seriously coordinated like the timing in Dealey Plaza. Wiggins had to be at the broken down car just slightly ahead of Mary being shot because Mary was the uncontrollable entity in the timing. The scene was a perfect CIA set-up location because the canal provided an uncrossable moat that protected the murder theater stage on the tow path. This was a well thought-out plan with a Pentagon spook brought in to assure military precision in the timing, events, and witnessing.
Wiggins said he had a strange sense that he was set-up to witness what his attention had been drawn to. The problem with using military patsies like Wiggins is they bring their combat senses with them and know when something isn't right.
So when you consider the broken down car and its import you realize Jim and Tom's attempt to discredit Janney by his weaknesses doesn't overcome critical evidence like this that broadcasts an Intel job. And that's why they omit it in their book-read criticisms. I think mainstream analysis of the events of the 1963 coup requires vigorous academic scrutiny and rigor. Jim does that to a fault, however I think sometimes these people get caught in a constant battle for integrity and don't know when to turn it off or when to not apply it to certain individuals where attacking less than water-tight research might come at the cost of denying real events.