20-10-2015, 08:54 PM
David,
You declare what you have proved. Who have you proved it, to? I am not comparing you to Fetzer, but
what are your boundaries, vs. Fetzers? You attempt to type what I do with one broad brush. I disagree because I examine the flaws and I confine myself to exploiting them with facts. Janney wrote a book in which he claimed his CIA assassin was missing since 1965. I dismantled that claim without the technique you assigned as my method.
My boundaries are well defined. I cannot be compared to Fetzer. I revised my last post before I read your newer one. I added an example of my approach to pushing back against the official claims of the 9/11 tower collapses. Fetzer's are more numerous and speculative, but are they more compelling to a wide audience?
Maybe at the heart of our disagreement, David, is our respective definition of a wide audience? Is a wide audience a
more reasonable body than a narrow one? Is reasonable more likely to be reliable? Is a "fringe" audience a small,
likeminded body? Fifty years on, are there examples of a small, likeminded body with a more reliable sense of what happened during a fifty year old, headline event, than the sense held by the general public?
If your BYP authenticity claims in either of your last two posts were as you seem to think they are, "done deals" I would not have replied to you. There are several things in your last post that I do not expect you can prove. I've taken considerable effort to make it much less likely that anything in my last two posts is as vulnerable. You posted as if you can prove autopsy or BYP photos were faked, but proved to who and where?
You declare what you have proved. Who have you proved it, to? I am not comparing you to Fetzer, but
what are your boundaries, vs. Fetzers? You attempt to type what I do with one broad brush. I disagree because I examine the flaws and I confine myself to exploiting them with facts. Janney wrote a book in which he claimed his CIA assassin was missing since 1965. I dismantled that claim without the technique you assigned as my method.
My boundaries are well defined. I cannot be compared to Fetzer. I revised my last post before I read your newer one. I added an example of my approach to pushing back against the official claims of the 9/11 tower collapses. Fetzer's are more numerous and speculative, but are they more compelling to a wide audience?
Maybe at the heart of our disagreement, David, is our respective definition of a wide audience? Is a wide audience a
more reasonable body than a narrow one? Is reasonable more likely to be reliable? Is a "fringe" audience a small,
likeminded body? Fifty years on, are there examples of a small, likeminded body with a more reliable sense of what happened during a fifty year old, headline event, than the sense held by the general public?
If your BYP authenticity claims in either of your last two posts were as you seem to think they are, "done deals" I would not have replied to you. There are several things in your last post that I do not expect you can prove. I've taken considerable effort to make it much less likely that anything in my last two posts is as vulnerable. You posted as if you can prove autopsy or BYP photos were faked, but proved to who and where?
David Josephs Wrote:.... like the autopsy photos - they themselves are not faked but actual photos of faked results. ..... ...........
DJ
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.