21-10-2015, 07:24 PM
So, I understand the evidentiary value of sending an officer to be a stand in. You put the officer on the stand and ask him if that's his picture, and then where he was standing. You then prove that Oswald rented that property, and voila!
What I don't understand: Do we have any idea why DPD is still concerned with building a court case four days after Oswald was buried?
What I don't understand: Do we have any idea why DPD is still concerned with building a court case four days after Oswald was buried?
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."