21-10-2015, 07:46 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:So, I understand the evidentiary value of sending an officer to be a stand in. You put the officer on the stand and ask him if that's his picture, and then where he was standing. You then prove that Oswald rented that property, and voila!
What I don't understand: Do we have any idea why DPD is still concerned with building a court case four days after Oswald was buried?
I think they were going thru motions to show the image(s) were NOT faked by placing someone there and showing how easily it works... maybe just a mind-play thing.
The case did not end simply because Oswald died... The investigation went on well beyond the publishing of the Report.
This may have been DPD CYA.... which makes it being the 133-C pose even more mysterious... almost like a little breadcrumb left to go along with the arrogance and hubris of pulling it off.
Just my guess...
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter