Impossible to refute evidence the BYPs are composites - this is a done deal

[Ray Mitcham]

Good point Ray...

Tell me please... I can see your head's shadow by the left pole.

No such shadow exists in the BYP. Would you say that's a fair comparison?

I couldn't get further back because of a low wall. All I would have to have done was step back another three feet and my shadow would not have been there. So yes I believe it is a good comparison.

What mm lens you using and at what distance?

Zoom 25mm at about 8 feet. Slight zoom. (Photo cropped)

Didn't note the details when taking the photo.

None of these affect the overall shape of the shadows.

133-A... on the left. where is the photographer's shadow?

Probably in the shadow beside the steps. or maybe the camera was angled so that he shadow was omitted.

133-A fits exactly with the blank image... I guess I should have only said that from my POV those shadows give the photos away.

Also, what do you suppose those two shadows about waist high to the left of the Oswald shadow facing the image are?
behind the post under the rifle shadow in 133-B and just there in 133-C cutting across the image..??.

Don't know which two shadows you mean.