10-11-2015, 12:11 AM
I think you're missing out on the bigger significance of those shadows, David. Given the fact that we could conceivably triangulate the position of the photographer by lining up the objects that appear to touch each other from the POV of the camera. Incorporating other folks work into your own, you might be able to determine the time of day, the day of the year, and height of the camera from the apparent difference of the shadows' direction due to perspective effects.
That might just tell you what kind of camera took the photo, and maybe whether it was a real short person or not. You want "irrefutable proof" its a fake? Prove its provenance is faked to start (i.e. that it couldn't have been taken at waist height by short Marina on a spring morning). That MUST be true, if it's also a composite.
Don't complain that someone proved exactly what you asked them to prove, but didn't use an Imperial Reflex camera on a spring day in the backyard at 214 Neely Street in Dallas. Also, as I've said before, (to Albert, if you weren't paying attention) once you start altering the images and making composites, the only thing you prove is that you've altered the image.
That might just tell you what kind of camera took the photo, and maybe whether it was a real short person or not. You want "irrefutable proof" its a fake? Prove its provenance is faked to start (i.e. that it couldn't have been taken at waist height by short Marina on a spring morning). That MUST be true, if it's also a composite.
Don't complain that someone proved exactly what you asked them to prove, but didn't use an Imperial Reflex camera on a spring day in the backyard at 214 Neely Street in Dallas. Also, as I've said before, (to Albert, if you weren't paying attention) once you start altering the images and making composites, the only thing you prove is that you've altered the image.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."