Help Needed

[Bob Prudhomme]

ok... now I get it.

O'Connor claims they removed a bullet from the right intercostal muscles which had gone in and down to the right.

I can't seem to get it to upload but if you google O'Connor, Probe, Vol 8 #3 Nov 2004 it's on page 49.

The entire article is amazing... i think it's also at ctka.net in the archived issues.

But he also says none of the removed organs had bullet holes or bullets in them.

I think you're reinforcing the idea that the back wound was real, did range downward and did not exit.

The FBI/SS says there was also another bullet lodged behind his ear and we know about the two CE399 deliveries.

So when nay sayers ask where all the bullets are... they're right where they were supposed to be.

DJ

As this diagram shows, the intercostal muscles, connecting the ribs to each other, are no thicker than the ribs themselves.



Therefore, I am puzzled when O'Connor states a bullet was removed from the right intercostal muscles, yet this same bullet "had gone in and down to the right".

In where? Down where? As the intercostal muscles are, perhaps, 3/4" thick at their thickest, for this bullet to go "in and down to the right" tells me this bullet was no longer in the intercostal muscle and somewhere in the pleural cavity instead. Find one of your own ribs, place your fingers on it and think about this. On the other side of that thin rib are very thin pleural membranes. On the other side of those membranes are your lungs.

Once again, this is an example of the smoke screen laid down by the conspirators. The "shallow" back wound is a perennial favourite, as the less enlightened amongst us refer to it as obvious proof the Single Bullet Theory never occurred, never once considering the source of the "shallow" back wound, and the fact it conceals much deeper and darker secrets.