10-01-2016, 05:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2016, 06:03 AM by Albert Doyle.)
Anthony Thorne Wrote:Newman's OSWALD AND THE CIA afterword discussing Angleton is better than most entire books I've read on the case. I'm looking forward to seeing what his current thoughts are on whodunnit.
Or, more importantly, Newman's tracing how internal CIA witnesses spoke of Oswald's 201 file being delayed and worked around red flagging detection by Angleton's CI/SIG department. A sure sign of CIA handling of Oswald and the true definition of Oswald's existence and actions that propagandists like Von Pein avoid like the devil. No person credibly analyzing the case would ignore how this true depiction of Oswald would condition things like the Money Order and just about every single thing involved with Oswald. There can be no greater oversight of Oswald on a covert basis than Angleton's CIA interest. Therefore it defies reason to ignore how this would affect the Money Order or persons suggesting there was no outside influence on it. (How could the deepest CIA department be confirmed as handling Oswald and have no awareness of, and therefore involvement with, the Money Order?)
This would have been the antidote to the propaganda poison CNN fed us on the anniversary. Newman countering Bugliosi and showing how this true record invalidated most of what Bugliosi offered.
.