Can anyone tell me if the doc is real or fake?

[Alan Ford]

Mr. Ford,

I am not familiar with FOIA documents as an expert, however, this document is the second document in the nine years of researching my father I found the word "sensitive" identified on the document. This attached document is in regards to my father. Richard Poyle is the source of information in this document.

Scott Kaiser

For future reference, Mr. Kaiser, Alan is suffice, but I do appreciate your decency to start otherwise.

As compared to your initial document marked "Sensitive" in post #1 above, in terms of placement upon the document and the colouring of the same sir, Are both documents marked in similar fashion, meaning the words 'Secret" and "Sensitive" were atop the page on the other document as well?

I see they were (courtesy of you sharing the other one, Thank You)

However, to the best of your knowledge, Are both words simply stamped in bold black or Are they red in colour?

Because you retraced your steps here, and I promised to do so in an earlier post, I feel obliged to share the Agency's prefix heading and respective endings as they relate to President Kennedy, his brother, RFK, and, of course, the wrongfully accused. They are as follows:

GPFloor (Mr. Oswald)
GPIdeal (President Kennedy)

Though RFK's bears the same prefix beginning, GP, I cannot seem to pull it up out of a myriad of "bookmarked" pages here, but in due time I'll retrace my steps and also add his here as well.

Now, with all of that said, I believe if memory serves me well, Mr. DiEugenio (Jim) may be privy to information detailing an instance or instances where GPFLOOR was actually linked to Agency spymaster David Atlee Phillips' code name, PBRUMEN, where both code names (his and the wrongfully accused) appeared jointly upon Agency cables, documents, letterheads, etc.

Yet, we are lead to believe the wrongfully accused is just a malcontent loner who just happens to shoot magical bullets. Right!

Bunch of lying treasonous cowards.

Likewise Alan, Scott will do. Some documents I have found at the Mary Ferrell Foundation site, others were sent to me by the United Justice Department, while others were "permanently borrowed." Like father, like son, I suppose. None of the documents had any colouring on them, they were all black and white. You, Jim and several more of you at this forum, the Education forum, and all across this vast frontier of internet space are more privy and familiar with these documents then I am, all I know how to do is pull them, read them, borrow them, and share them. Hope that answers any questions.

Scott

Good evening, Scott

Appreciate your prompt response. Truth be told, I am not in the same league as, quote, "Jim and several more of you at this forum, the Education forum, and all across this vast frontier of internet space are more privy and familiar with these documents", so we both are fortunate they possess this skill-set. My question in respect to the documents being stamped 'Secret" and/or "Sensitive" in red colouring or simply bold black lettering was to determine if there was/is a systematic presentation-stamp in use by the intelligence divisions all across the alphabetical spectrum, which--IF so--would help in determining the authenticity of sensitive documents. Uniformed patterns IMHO would help separate genuine documents from anything less.

Not sure if you may already be familiar with that old Rowley-McCone Memo that began circulating years ago, where supposedly new Agency DCI McCone shares with Secret Service Chief Rowley that Oswald is a "Company" man so to speak, but to keep it hush-hush, yada, yada, yada...well, as much as I personally would want something to that effect to be true, we just have to be careful to do what former President Reagan said, "Trust, but verify".

Wish I could have been of more help. Will insert RFK's GP codename ending sequence here some time tomorrow. Wish you well moving forward, Scott, with securing the answers you seek on this matter.