05-02-2016, 11:22 PM
of course the detectible anomalies will be harder to detect if spread out over multiple sets of frames, but that also means that more of the stuff you want to edit out will remain in the film. Like the backwards head motion, for example, occupies 3-4 frames of zapruder. The information that you don't want people to see would have to be contained completely within the 2/3 of 1/18.3 seconds that you have removed (.036 seconds).
Also, the problematic zapruder frames don't amount to "hundreds" of frames.
There's plenty of other researchers that have concluded more sophisticated methods were used. google "zapruder alteration" for a small sample. There was a pretty good lecture at a JFK anniversary conference by a guy that seemed to know a lot about photography in a thread here about 6 months ago?
Also, the problematic zapruder frames don't amount to "hundreds" of frames.
There's plenty of other researchers that have concluded more sophisticated methods were used. google "zapruder alteration" for a small sample. There was a pretty good lecture at a JFK anniversary conference by a guy that seemed to know a lot about photography in a thread here about 6 months ago?
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."