19-02-2016, 04:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-02-2016, 06:50 PM by Albert Doyle.)
It's really hard to believe but Armstrong makes a good case that the rifle order evidence, including the Money Order, was hastily forged the night of the assassination.
My only question is could Holmes have seen the evidence that the letter was sent in the morning before he made that statement?
The reason I say it is hard to believe is because it boggles the mind that they would dare that level of corruption of the evidence. Which in turn makes you ask how badly did they corrupt the rest of the evidence? The level of corruption Armstrong exposes easily allows for Harvey and Lee.
Let's get down to it. If FBI had evidence of the Oswald purchase on the Klein's microfilm record they would have brought it forward into the spotlight. Instead of doing that they lost the microfilm. How would they interpret that if you tried to get away with that with them?
.
My only question is could Holmes have seen the evidence that the letter was sent in the morning before he made that statement?
The reason I say it is hard to believe is because it boggles the mind that they would dare that level of corruption of the evidence. Which in turn makes you ask how badly did they corrupt the rest of the evidence? The level of corruption Armstrong exposes easily allows for Harvey and Lee.
Let's get down to it. If FBI had evidence of the Oswald purchase on the Klein's microfilm record they would have brought it forward into the spotlight. Instead of doing that they lost the microfilm. How would they interpret that if you tried to get away with that with them?
.