08-03-2016, 06:37 AM
Yah, Maggie, I spent much of my life being horrified by the Russian bogey man.
Here's an article that reflects only indirectly on Putin in that he has expressed his full support for the RCB. Here's an article from Russia Insider by Alexander Mercouris. This article demonstrates just how committed the RCB is to the neo-liberal model.
Here's a more sympathetic read Putin and the RCB. My money is that it is way too optimistic. but it does explain why the RCB is such disaster for Russia -- it's a law made specifically for Russia that Putin is committed to following -- proudly.:
hock::
I would be glad to be proven wrong.
Here's an article that reflects only indirectly on Putin in that he has expressed his full support for the RCB. Here's an article from Russia Insider by Alexander Mercouris. This article demonstrates just how committed the RCB is to the neo-liberal model.
Quote:As regular Russia Insider readers know, Jon Hellevig and I have for some time been baffled by the Russian Central Bank's insistence on keeping interest rates high at 11%.
This despite the fact inflation is falling rapidly, and despite the fact the high interest rates are prolonging the recession.
The latest figures from Rosstat (the Russian Federal Statistics Service) show inflation at the end of February had fallen to an annualised rate of 8.2%, and weekly inflation had fallen to 0.1% in the last week of February.
The Economics Ministry is now predicting inflation will continue to fall in March, and will be well below 8% by the end of the month.
This is the diametric opposite of the course for inflation the Central Bank was predicting at the start of the year.
At that time the Central Bank was saying inflation would rise because of the further fall in the rouble. It even said it might reach 16%.
Jon Hellevig has explained why this prediction was wrong.
The Central Bank underestimated the degree to which it was the growth of import prices that was behind the historic increases in inflation.
Following the collapse of imports caused by the rouble's devaluation and the ban on EU food imports, this is now a rapidly diminishing factor, which is why inflation is falling fast.
The mystery however is why, despite inflation going in the opposite direction to the one it predicted, the Central Bank is persisting with its high interest rate policy.
As of the time of writing it is hinting it will not cut interest rates until the third quarter despite pleas from the Economic Ministry that it start cutting interest rates at its next scheduled meeting later this month.
Central Bank First Deputy Governor Ksenia Yudayeva has now provided the answer in an interview to the TV station Rossiya 24.
She admitted that the level of the rouble is having less of an effect on the economy than it did last year, and that the coefficient of the exchange rate to the rate of inflation has changed.
She also admitted inflation risks are becoming less marked, though she insists it is too early to speak of this as a stable tendency, and that inflation risks remain "quite high".
What however is holding the Central Bank back is - in her own words - the following:"What worries us quite seriously is that medium-term inflationary expectations, in particular those of the professional community, not only economic agents, but professionals, not anchored at a level even close to 4% to this target, which we have. And us there is a very serious task is to make it so that all believe that we a) want to reach it and b) will carry out such a policy, which will allow for reaching it".In plain language, what principally worries the Central Bank is not inflation, the rouble's exchange rate, the savings rate, or the general state of the economy, but the Central Bank's credibility - or lack of it - with the financial community (ie. bankers, financial analysts and traders) who doubt it is serious about its 4% inflation target.
In other words the Central Bank is keeping the interest rates high - and the economy in recession - so that it can gain the confidence of these people.
Behind this one senses the Central Bank's festering sense of humiliation for what happened in December 2014, when it briefly lost control of the rouble because it hesitated to raise interest rates and did not intervene aggressively enough to support the rouble in the currency markets.
All one can say about this is that gaining credibility is one thing, and running scared is another.
The route to the first is never gained through the second. The reason there is now a crisis of confidence in Western Central Banks' ability to manage the Western economy is because for far too long Western Central Banks did whatever the West's financial community wanted.
The Russian Central Bank should learn this lesson and should not fall into the trap of doing the same thing.
If general economic conditions point to the need for a reduction in interest rates - which in Russia they do - then the Russian Central Bank should have the courage of its convictions and just do it, and not worry too much about what the financial community thinks.
That is the way to gain credibility, and to show to the financial community who is the master.
Source URL (retrieved on 03/07/2016 - 15:42): http://russia-insider.com/en/business/hi...tion-about
Links:
[1] http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=htt...tion-about
[2] https://twitter.com/share?text=Don%27t+B...tion-about
[3] https://plus.google.com/share?url=http:/...tion-about
[4] http://russia-insider.com/en/print/13164
[5] http://russia-insider.com/user/92
[6] http://russia-insider.com/user/feed/92
[7] http://russia-insider.com/en/business/hi...qus_thread
[8] http://russia-insider.com/support
[9] http://russia-insider.com/sites/insider/...vmOXRl.jpg
[10] http://russia-insider.com/sites/insider/...vmOXRl.jpg
[11] https://www.facebook.com/RussiaInsider
[12] http://russia-insider.com/en/commenting-guidelines
Here's a more sympathetic read Putin and the RCB. My money is that it is way too optimistic. but it does explain why the RCB is such disaster for Russia -- it's a law made specifically for Russia that Putin is committed to following -- proudly.:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f41fa/f41fa4521a6b6a73ecea0fee60a6969cc3efdd45" alt="Confused Confused"
I would be glad to be proven wrong.
Quote:The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) belongs to a foreign state the City of London. The City of London still hands out orders to the Russian financial institution, with Washington watching closely over her shoulder. Should the CBR wish to print currency, it can only do so with a corresponding change to its foreign currency cash flow, and can only buy US bonds for dollars paid for Russian oil. It's a situation that much resembles a noose around the neck of the Russian economy. Once the knot is pulled tight, the economy will struggle and choke.[1]Putin is a man renowned for his defensive tactics. He also appears to have some foresight into financial matters, calculating his every move as though it were a game of chess. East versus West. Both sides are currently playing for checkmate.
"The law says that the Central Bank is governed by international agreements." Let's dissect this statement. Firstly, no other central bank in the world is not permitted to support its own national economy. The Russian Central Bank is the only one in existence with laws governing it that do not support, or even abide by the requirements of the Russian economy. [2] Indeed, there are detailed pages regarding the running of the institution from abroad. The following quote sums up the situation Russia is facing:
"If you have low interest rates in developed countries, free rate works for you. If you have high interest rates, as in underdeveloped countries, free rate works against you. The free rate is good when you have a free country. When a country is a colony with high stakes, then the free rate, on the contrary, is pumping money out of the country." [3] Russia is still considered an underdeveloped country by the West, and so we know which side it is on in that regard.
Putin is under pressure from a lot of sides: geopolitically, economically and militarily. This is why we should watch the Central Bank of Russia closely. Nationalizing it would give us the first signals that things have changed. Changing the ownership from Private to State ownership could indicate Putin's need to raise money for other projects, not approved of by the West. This would show the West that the Rothschild stronghold (over the bank and therefore Russia) would no longer be tolerated.
[1] Anders. (2014, December 15). Putin´s Confident: Putin to Nationalize Rothschild´s Central Bank and Purge "Collaborators" with West. "War till One Side Collapses inevitable." Retrieved fromhttp://new.euro-med.dk/20141215-putins-c...itable.php
[2] Coppola, F. (2014, November 1). Why The Russian Central Bank Can't Defend The Ruble. [Forbes]. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppo...the-ruble/
[3] (2014, December 30). USA instructs Russian Central Bank how to strangle Russian economy.Retrieved from http://english.pravda.ru/russia/economic...al_bank-0/
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl