05-04-2016, 09:24 AM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Ray Mitcham Wrote:Quote by Doyle
" Tony, I mentioned in my previous post that if Prayer Person was at the front of the landing and Tie Man was inside the foyer - if Prayer Person was of equal height to Tie Man that the perspective difference would actually make Prayer Person shorter. I see you somehow didn't answer that. Your methodology is complete garbage Tony. "
I'll let others judge who is the liar
You have become the laughing stock of the internet. You don't have a single supporter of your position or statements. Begone, you charlatan.
Ray is arguing with himself and just doesn't get it. He fails to comprehend that if Prayer Man is at the front of the landing and appears to be of equal height to Tie Man, who is inside the foyer, that means perspective would necessitate that Prayer Man is shorter. Ray's problem is he doesn't understand the argument.
Ray, do me a favor. Step back and watch a pro and learn something. Thanks to Alan's tip I've finally sealed the deal on this because Lovelady, compared to Prayer Man in Unger's gif, clearly shows he is 2-3 inches taller. Since Lovelady is 5 foot 8 that means we have a second confirming source for Prayer Man being 5 foot 5 or 6.
Alan doesn't realize he's beaten.
Quote:You have become the laughing stock of the internet. You don't have a single supporter of your position or statements. Begone, you charlatan.
False. Unger admitted my arguments caused him to realize Prayer Man is at the front of the landing. Drew was able to formulate confirming trigonometry because of my triangulation argument. And Gilbride was honest enough to admit what I wrote swayed him and offer confirming arguments on the Education Forum. Now Lee Kania also agrees.
The biggest supporter I have are the facts you seem to be defiant, if not outright ignorant, of.
Every body is wrong except the idiot, Doyle.
Show us your triangulation argument, Buttons. Drawings or photos, not words.