31-07-2016, 06:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 31-07-2016, 07:58 PM by Lauren Johnson.)
Magda Hassan Wrote:Cliff Varnell Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Hilary has said she is prepared to compromise on abortion. No sure thing there.
Hillary said she was thinking of appointing a pro-life Supreme Court Justice?::
Citation please!
Hilary and I said nothing about appointing a pro-life Supreme Court Justice. I said she has stated she is prepared to compromise on abortion. What form that may take is any one's guess.
http://modernliberals.com/major-problem-...ack-obama/
Late term abortion, Magda.
Yes, she's willing to compromise on late term abortion, not abortion rights per se.
Quote:HILLARY CLINTON: My husband vetoed a very restrictive legislation on late-term abortions and he vetoed it at an event in the White House where we invited a lot of women who had faced this very difficult decision, that ought to be made based on their own conscience, their family, their faith, in consultation with doctors. Those stories left a searing impression on me. Women who think their pregnancy is going well and then wake up and find some really terrible problem. Women whose life is threatened if they carry their child to term, and women who are told by doctors that the child they're carrying will not survive.
Again, I am where I have been, which is that if there's a way to structure some kind of constitutional restriction that take into account the life of the mother and her health, then I'm open to that. But I have yet to see the Republicans willing to actually do that, and that would be an area, where if they included health, you could see constitutional action.
Context is everything.