From fake 2000 electoral rolls to fake 9/11 victims

[Paul Rigby]

Blimey Paul

No sooner to I claw my way out of one labyrinthine rabbit hole - scratching my head and wondering if I'm dreaming the stuff - than you send me down another one!

The general thesis underlying the 'September Clues' site referenced in the above threads - that of video and photo fakery - leads to conclusions that are so 'far out' as to render them ridiculous at first blush; But then so did any dissent from the official narrative of 9/11 just a few short years ago.

There really is some VERY thought-provoking stuff there, and that from geeks in their mid-twenties.

I know exactly what you mean, Pete, for I, too, feel uncomfortable with the notion of fake victims etc. But a couple of things to bear in mind.

First, the use of a prepared film to sell a wholly inaccurate version of a major covert op is nothing new - see the Z-fraud, most notably, but by no means exclusively.

Second, given what we have long known about the basic absurdities of the OCT - everything from the utter implausibilty of four, yes, four, successful cabin entries without despatch of the simple emergency signal by any of the pilots, to the preposterously contradictory nature of the alleged in-flight phone calls - we must question everything.

And from some of what I've seen from the Young Turks at one particular 9/11forum, the case for prepared film and fake casualties is overwhelming. I should add that my strong suspicion is that some of the info surfacing is from within the belly of the beast itself.