01-09-2016, 03:39 AM
You have got to love history, especially history that's 50 years old and topics that have been covered before, this could be "leave no stone unturn" I suppose?
What excites me is finding new information, stuff that hasn't been covered, leading any author to provide new evidence, the kind of eveidence that has you in awe, things that make you go hmmmmm?
Here's the question, are you ready for it? Better question, could you handle it? I suppose it all depends on who's delivering the material? I mean if you like the person you're receiving the material from then that material becomes credible, however, if it were to come from say someone who's not so liked then he must be a liar right? Even if the two were to qoute the same passage while providing the same source surely one will out do the other.
What excites me is finding new information, stuff that hasn't been covered, leading any author to provide new evidence, the kind of eveidence that has you in awe, things that make you go hmmmmm?
Here's the question, are you ready for it? Better question, could you handle it? I suppose it all depends on who's delivering the material? I mean if you like the person you're receiving the material from then that material becomes credible, however, if it were to come from say someone who's not so liked then he must be a liar right? Even if the two were to qoute the same passage while providing the same source surely one will out do the other.