10-09-2016, 02:57 PM
The fact that Baer claimed, in 2008, to know the identity of someone who cashed out prior to 9/11 wouldn't make him an "accessory after the fact" in 2001. Nor would it necessarily subject him to obstruction of justice charges since the official investigation was complete in 2004. It would depend on when he received this information. However, you can well imagine that, if the new 9/11 litigation bill passed yesterday survives the threatened presidential veto, that the Saudis (who have an intelligence organization of their own, and enough money to hire a formidable defense team) will take an interest in deposing him.
So, I would suggest that Corbett delay airing a "series of videos" until after the Senate and the House have the opportunity to override a veto.
So, I would suggest that Corbett delay airing a "series of videos" until after the Senate and the House have the opportunity to override a veto.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."