Robert Baer and the 9/11 Put Option Scandal

[R.K. Locke]

The fact that Baer claimed, in 2008, to know the identity of someone who cashed out prior to 9/11 wouldn't make him an "accessory after the fact" in 2001. Nor would it necessarily subject him to obstruction of justice charges since the official investigation was complete in 2004. It would depend on when he received this information. However, you can well imagine that, if the new 9/11 litigation bill passed yesterday survives the threatened presidential veto, that the Saudis (who have an intelligence organization of their own, and enough money to hire a formidable defense team) will take an interest in deposing him.

So, I would suggest that Corbett delay airing a "series of videos" until after the Senate and the House have the opportunity to override a veto.

I'm not a fan of Corbett. This video is just one more example. Baer has been all over the map on 9/11. I think his job is to spread disinfo.

I think his work is generally good but his list of "suspects" is a strange one so far. It also falls prey to many of the same fallacies that JFK research and analysis does - i.e. mistaking facilitators for sponsors, over-generalizing, failing to distinguish between foreknowledge and active participation, etc. His latest is about the "Dancing Israelis":