16-10-2016, 08:36 AM
The below is the original Newsweek article about the impending demise of Erdogan that Sir Herbert referenced above:
***
I imagine that one event that triggered Rubin's Newsweek article (dated 15th October 2016) is the brief report below about closer military and intelligence ties between Putin and Erdogan following their meeting in Istanbul last Monday (10th October 2016) as reported below.
Turkey, a critical regional NATO member, publicly aligning closer to Russia in military and intelligence matters must be viewed with great concern in Washington and Brussels.
Quote:SourceMICHAEL RUBIN: IS ANOTHER COUP IN TURKEY IN THE CARDS?
ErdoÄŸan wouldn't survive a third attempt to overthrow him.
BY MICHAEL RUBIN ON 10/15/16 AT 2:30 AM
PauseFullscreenShare
Mute
Current Time0:48
Duration Time4:12
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
QualitySD
Eight Surprising Facts About Recep Tayyip Erdogan
This article first appeared on the American Enterprise Institute site.
It has now been almost three months since the failed coup in Turkey.
Sign up Sign up to our daily newsletter for up to date global news and features.
The events of July 15 were predictable, but they nevertheless mark a watershed in modern Turkish history. Still, it would be a mistake to view the coup as a single event.
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan in New York City on September 19. Michael Rubin writes that Erdogan wouldn't survive a third attempt to overthrow him. BRENDAN MCDERMID/REUTERS Turkey actually experienced two coups, but it will be the third and coming coup that could be the most violent and might very well cost Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan his life.
The first coup was the bungled and clumsy putsch attempt on the evening of July 15 2016. While Erdogan declared the failed putsch "a gift from God" because it offered an excuse to purge enemies real and imagined, the genesis of the initial coup remains murky.
Erdogan fingered followers of former ally-turned-rival Fethullah Gülen, whom Erdogan designated the Fethullah Terrorist Organization (FETO). The proof Erdogan presented, both in the Turkish press and to the U.S. government, substituted suspicion and circumstantial evidence for proof.
Dani Rodrik, a Harvard University professor and son-in-law of a prominent Turkish general, outlined the most coherent argument about how and why Gülen's followers might have been involved. Rodrik makes a persuasive case, but caution is nevertheless needed both because information he omits might sway outcomes and because to draw conclusions upon the logic of cui bono assumes foresight always triumphs over unintended consequences as events unfold.
My own read is that while some Gülen followers participated and may even have had foreknowledge, they were joined by some among the Kemalist officer corps as well. There is ample evidence that not everyone in the Turkish intelligence serviceand even within elite Justice and Development Party circles had clean hands.
The Gülenists simply made useful scapegoats for the ills that followed. Whoever was ultimately behind the coupand, unlike with past coups in Turkey, this remains unclearwhat is certain is that Erdogan had learned of the plot hours before it unfolded.
The second coup was Erdogan's autogolpe. This has actually been more destructive to Turkey's fabric and democracy than the initial events of July 15. In the September 2016 issue of Commentary, I explored both Erdogan's intellectual upbringing and his end game.
Suffice to say, it is not pretty. But Erdogan's intellectual upbringing and Machiavellian political savvy have all led to this point.
What few talk about openly but certainly have started whispering about privately, is a third possible coup on the horizon.
While Erdogan shed his long alliance with Gülen in 2013, the Turkish leader has not been without allies. Here, the case of Sedat Peker is interesting. An ultra-nationalist, Peker is reputed and widely reported to be Turkey's most powerful mafioso. He was arrested during the course of Ergenekon plot and sentenced to several years in prison, but was among the first released even before the evidence backing the case was exposed as fraudulent.
Peker's controversial background never stopped Erdogan from associating and cooperating with him, however. Gülenists may have a broader network, but Peker's connections are reportedly just as powerful.
And while Erdogan once used Gülen's network to do his dirty work, it is just as possible that Peker and others like former True Path Party (DYP) official Mehmet Ağar (who also has a checkered past but has cultivated close relations with Erdogan) may now believe that they are using Erdogan to do their own dirty work.
After all, as Erdogan targets Gülenists, ethnic Kurds, liberals, feminists and the political opposition, he is eliminating not only his own enemies but also those of Peker and his closest allies.
Soon the key question will need an answer: If neither Erdogan nor some of the more shadowy figures of the Turkish mafia and deep state can tolerate competition, what happens when Erdogan and the Turkish mafia are the only powers remaining? If there is a showdown, will it be violent?
The downside of consolidating power to the extreme Erdogan has is the vacuum that develops when he is removed. Erdogan has taken a deeply polarized Turkey and put it in a pressure-cooker. With normal political competition no long available as an outlet for pressure, deadly political violence become more likely.
The nature of the deep state is that it reaches across political and ethnic factions, as the 1996 Susurluk scandal demonstrated. If Erdogan is assassinatedand there will be attemptsthe remaining Turkish deep state will be most able to fill the vacuum.
Generally speaking, Peker and his fellow-travelers are not likely to put their ambition or ideology aside. Even if Peker would never want to hold the formal reins of state, he has enough connections to veteran Turkish politicians to place a figurehead in the presidential palace.
Erdogan may believe he is sultan but, in reality, he may already be dead man walking.
Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. A former Pentagon official, his major research areas are the Middle East, Turkey, Iran and diplomacy.
***
I imagine that one event that triggered Rubin's Newsweek article (dated 15th October 2016) is the brief report below about closer military and intelligence ties between Putin and Erdogan following their meeting in Istanbul last Monday (10th October 2016) as reported below.
Turkey, a critical regional NATO member, publicly aligning closer to Russia in military and intelligence matters must be viewed with great concern in Washington and Brussels.
Quote:SourcePUTIN AND ERDOGAN AGREE TO DEEPEN MILITARY COOPERATION
Russia and Turkey discussed joint military and intelligence efforts in Syria.
BY DAMIEN SHARKOV ON 10/11/16 AT 1:18 PM
PauseFullscreenShare
Mute
Current Time0:04
Duration Time0:46
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
QualitySD
Eight Surprising Facts About Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan have agreed to increase cooperation in intelligence and military operations, the BBC's Russian service reports.
The two leaders have moved closer in recent months as their respective relationships with the West have soured for different reasons. Russia and Turkey's involvement in the Syrian conflict has also increased the demand for contact between the two, after much of the last year saw a collapse in bilateral relations due to Turkey's downing of a Russian jet in November.
Sign up Sign up to our daily newsletter for up to date global news and features.
Putin arrived in Istanbul for much friendlier talks with Erdogan Monday, during which they agreed to join efforts in their Syrian operations, though did not specify in what way.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin ® and Turkey's President Tayyip Erdogan review a guard of honor during a welcoming ceremony at the Presidential Palace in Ankara, Turkey, December 1, 2014. The two met in Istanbul, Turkey, Monday in a bid to build closer military cooperation. UMIT BEKTAS/REUTERS "Our respective departments will discuss (cooperation), in particular, through the military, intelligence on the line, through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, establish contact and as a result develop a strategy," Erdogan said.
Erdogan's increasingly close relationship with Putin has troubled his NATO allies, although Germany has expressed confidence that this contact will not affect Turkey's resolve in NATO.
The two countries also struck a long-awaited agreement on the Turkish stream pipeline, pumping gas across the Black Sea towards Turkey.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14