18-10-2016, 07:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 18-10-2016, 09:12 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Tom says,
Tom,
Please understand there is a difference between genealogy, naming every mother, father, sister and brother and real evidence, I apologize if you're having a very difficult time in disguising the two.
I am NOT racist, so, I'm going to get that out of the way right now, in-fact I was married to a Mexican, but Tom, I could picture you in a courtroom on a ticket charge, and your client was a Mexican, you'd probably have him call in his entire family just to beat that parking ticket!
Although, this brother is connected to that brother who had a Library card. I think you have to do a little better then that.
My over zealous advertising and non stop thread-downing while promoting [facts] can't even be discredited by you!
Quote:In between posts by surrogates and Scott's incessant self-promotion amounting to thread drowning, non-stop advertisement, I had hoped for a discussion of a key question, who are (or at least examples of "tells" leading us to who implicated the one name the assassination was pinned on, and possibly, why.)
Tom,
Please understand there is a difference between genealogy, naming every mother, father, sister and brother and real evidence, I apologize if you're having a very difficult time in disguising the two.
I am NOT racist, so, I'm going to get that out of the way right now, in-fact I was married to a Mexican, but Tom, I could picture you in a courtroom on a ticket charge, and your client was a Mexican, you'd probably have him call in his entire family just to beat that parking ticket!
Although, this brother is connected to that brother who had a Library card. I think you have to do a little better then that.
My over zealous advertising and non stop thread-downing while promoting [facts] can't even be discredited by you!