The attempted Clinton-CIA coup against Donald Trump

[David Guyatt]

Those unnamed CIA sources are supposed to be more reliable than the MSM's unnamed CIA sources? How?

From the article:
[FONT=&amp]"Instead, it hinged on what unnamed lawmakers had supposedly been told"

The lawmakers were the members of the intelligence committees in both parties in Congress. Some of them were named, like Mitch McConnell.

Again from the article:
"On Monday, The Washington Post began the week attacking General Michael Flynn Sr., Trump's nominee for National Security Advisor for supporting a True Pundit story in early Nov. which the Post said detailed allegations that Hillary Clinton and her campaign director John Podesta were part of a child trafficking ring in D.C. and beyond dubbed "Pizzagate."Sounds quite intriguing except True Pundit never wrote any such story. Flynn on Twitter, had backed a True Pundit story detailing an active FBI investigation into Clinton and her foundation. "

Now here is Flynn's Tweet:[/FONT]
U decide - NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes w Children, etc...MUST READ! https://t.co/O0bVJT3QDr
General Flynn (@GenFlynn) November 3, 2016

And here is the article he linked to:
http://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell...y-perjury/

NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury

I completely agree with you that there was an unamed CIA analyst quoted in that story and therefore little to no credibility in what he said.

Thanks for that. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. No one can, without being totally hypocritical, argue that the above story has no validity and yet maintain that the Russian did it meme does have credibility based on.... unnamed sources and zero factual evidence.

'Nuff said.