15-12-2016, 11:24 PM
What Tom seems to express is unavoidable reasoning to follow conclusions as presented. There is absolutely nothing wrong to swim in theory, most of the language if not all of it Tom put up hence at how the Federal Reserve Bank charges the dispersing Banks PMOs, and it seems to me that once all avenues have been exhausted, no one is no longer swimming in theory, then the evidence which now presents itself closes this part of the line of questioning without debate. I believe I did just that Tom.
If the following statement seems to be factual evidence for some, it's not for me, in a post recorded from Tom is the following statment.
"The holes indicate the serial number of the money order and the exact amount of the face value, and nothing else."
Tom, my suggestion to you even though you're a lawyer I believe you should let theories raise theories, and facts be facts.
If the following statement seems to be factual evidence for some, it's not for me, in a post recorded from Tom is the following statment.
"The holes indicate the serial number of the money order and the exact amount of the face value, and nothing else."
Tom, my suggestion to you even though you're a lawyer I believe you should let theories raise theories, and facts be facts.