01-10-2009, 05:27 AM
Despite protestations, the Bledsoe Document has importance...
even if a "joke" as claimed.
1. It is a criminal offense to perpetrate a hoax on an official
city record form, creating an offense report which did not
happen.
2. Who created the hoax?
3. Who was the victim of the "joke"?
4. What was the purpose of the "joke"? It never became public
until it was "discovered" in the archives of Marguerite Oswald
in the 1990s.
5. If genuine, what is the meaning of the U ARE A FINK message;
who was the fink and why was this message directed at him?
6. If Perry and Mack know the identity of the perpetrator, by
protecting him, they become accessories to criminal act.
7. I want to know why Marguerite Oswald was provided a copy
of the report.
8. I want to know how Perry and Mack obtained the original
document, which is what you have posted. This means that the
original likely was in the Dallas Police files, compounding the
offense.
I do not buy the "joke" as innocent fun. Someone went to great
lengths to perpetrate a knowingly false official report, using facts
unknown to most researchers. I want to know who did this, and
what was his motive, and why he was not prosecuted.
Jack
even if a "joke" as claimed.
1. It is a criminal offense to perpetrate a hoax on an official
city record form, creating an offense report which did not
happen.
2. Who created the hoax?
3. Who was the victim of the "joke"?
4. What was the purpose of the "joke"? It never became public
until it was "discovered" in the archives of Marguerite Oswald
in the 1990s.
5. If genuine, what is the meaning of the U ARE A FINK message;
who was the fink and why was this message directed at him?
6. If Perry and Mack know the identity of the perpetrator, by
protecting him, they become accessories to criminal act.
7. I want to know why Marguerite Oswald was provided a copy
of the report.
8. I want to know how Perry and Mack obtained the original
document, which is what you have posted. This means that the
original likely was in the Dallas Police files, compounding the
offense.
I do not buy the "joke" as innocent fun. Someone went to great
lengths to perpetrate a knowingly false official report, using facts
unknown to most researchers. I want to know who did this, and
what was his motive, and why he was not prosecuted.
Jack